Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 19, 2025

Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe comorbidities: A retrospective cohort study
Liang Tang1,2, Paul Sorajja1, Michael Mooney1
1Valve Science Center, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Insights
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patients with severe comorbidities (sCM) face significantly lower survival rates. While TAVR offers limited mortality benefit for these patients, quality of life may still improve.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Geriatric Cardiology
Background:
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a key treatment for aortic stenosis.
- The benefits of TAVR in patients with severe comorbidities (sCM) are not well-established.
- sCM may limit the survival and quality-of-life benefits of TAVR.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term outcomes of TAVR in patients with sCM.
- To compare survival and quality-of-life post-TAVR between patients with and without sCM.
- To identify risk factors associated with mortality after TAVR in patients with sCM.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 890 TAVR patients from January 2011 to August 2018.
- sCM included severe lung disease, liver disease, end-stage renal disease, dementia, dilated cardiomyopathy, and frailty.
- Comparison of outcomes between patients with (n=215) and without (n=675) sCM.
Main Results:
- Patients with sCM had worse baseline symptoms, higher predicted mortality (STS-PROM), and lower quality of life (KCCQ).
- Three-year all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the sCM group (40% vs. 79%).
- The composite endpoint of mortality, heart failure re-hospitalization, myocardial infarction, or stroke was also worse in the sCM group (31% vs. 64%).
- Quality of life (KCCQ) improved similarly in both groups post-TAVR.
- Severe comorbidities, except liver disease, increased mortality risk; each additional comorbidity multiplied mortality risk by 2.8.
Conclusions:
- TAVR patients with sCM experience poor 3-year survival outcomes.
- Despite limited survival benefits, TAVR may lead to quality-of-life improvements in patients with sCM.
- The presence of multiple severe comorbidities significantly increases mortality risk post-TAVR.
Objective:
To investigate the long-term outcomes of patients with severe comorbidities (sCM) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
Background:
The benefit of TAVR may be limited among patients with sCM due to a lack of mortality- or quality-of-life-benefit.
Methods:
All TAVR patients in the Allina Health System between January 1, 2011 and August 7, 2018 were included (n = 890, 82 ± 8 years, 55% men). sCM included: severe lung disease, severe liver disease, end-stage renal disease, severe, severe dementia, severe dilated cardiomyopathy, and frailty. Outcomes between patients with (n = 215, 24%) and without (n = 675, 76%) sCM were compared.
Results:
At baseline, patients with sCM had worse symptoms, higher STS-PROM and a lower Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score compared to those without. During a median follow-up of 15 months (IQR, 7-29 months), there were 208 (23%) deaths. Patients with sCM had a lower 3-year survival free from all-cause mortality (40% vs. 79%, p < .001), and lower 3-year survival free from the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, re-hospitalization for heart failure, myocardial infarction or stroke (31% vs. 64%, p < .001) compared to those without sCM. The estimated monthly increase in KCCQ scores following TAVR was 1.5, 95%CI (1.3, 1.7), p < .001 irrespective of sCM grouping. From Cox regression analysis, severe comorbidities, with the exception of liver disease, were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and any additional comorbidity was associated with a multiplicative increase in risk of mortality of 2.8 (95%CI 2.3, 3.6), p < .001.
Conclusions:
TAVR patients with sCM have poor 3-year outcomes but may experience improvements in their quality of life.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management

