Posterior full-endoscopic cervical discectomy in cervical radiculopathy: A prospective cohort study

This study was conducted to assess the clinical outcomes of using the posterior full-endoscopic cervical discectomy (PECD) in comparison with the conventional anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) in treating patients with cervical radiculopathy.

From May 2015 to January 2018, patients with single cervical radiculopathy were enrolled in this study. The operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, and perioperative complications were recorded. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain, the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the modified MacNab criteria were used to quantify the postoperative outcomes.

A total of 84 patients were initially enrolled in this study, while three patients were lost during the follow-up. The remaining 81 patients were divided into two groups. Thirty-eight patients underwent conventional ACDF, and the rest 43 patients were treated by PECD procedure. The patients in the ACDF group were slightly older than those in the PECD group (51.4 ± 8.2 VS 46.6 ± 8.8 years old, p = 0.012*). The blood loss and hospital stay were significantly less in patients treated with PECD compared with those undergoing ACDF (p < 0.05*). There were no significant differences in the VAS scores, the NDI, and the modified MacNab criteria between the two groups. The patients in the ACDF group obtained a better Cobb angle and had less operative time compared with those in the PECD group (p < 0.05*). Only mild complications were observed in both groups, with no significant difference (p = 0.28).

PECD could significantly relieve pain and disability with no severe complication, and the majority of patients were satisfied with this technique. Thus, it is safe and effective to use this procedure in managing patients with cervical radiculopathy as an alternative procedure to ACDF.