Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 19, 2025

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Supporting anticoagulant treatment decision making to optimise stroke prevention in complex patients with atrial
Melina Gattellari1,2, Andrew Hayen3, Dominic Y C Leung4,5
1Department of Neurology, Institute for Clinical Neurosciences, Neuroscience Research, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown (Sydney), New South Wales, 2050, Australia. melina.gattellari@health.nsw.gov.au.
Background:
Anticoagulation for preventing stroke in atrial fibrillation is under-utilised despite evidence supporting its use, resulting in avoidable death and disability. We aimed to evaluate an intervention to improve the uptake of anticoagulation.
Methods:
We carried out a national, cluster randomised controlled trial in the Australian primary health care setting. General practitioners received an educational session, delivered via telephone by a medical peer and provided information about their patients selected either because they were not receiving anticoagulation or for whom anticoagulation was considered challenging. General practitioners were randomised to receive feedback from a medical specialist about the cases (expert decisional support) either before or after completing a post-test audit. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients reported as receiving oral anticoagulation. A secondary outcome assessed antithrombotic treatment as appropriate against guideline recommendations.
Results:
One hundred and seventy-nine general practitioners participated in the trial, contributing information about 590 cases. At post-test, 152 general practitioners (84.9%) completed data collection on 497 cases (84.2%). A 4.6% (Adjusted Relative Risk = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.86-1.43) difference in the post-test utilization of anticoagulation between groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.42). Sixty-one percent of patients in both groups received appropriate antithrombotic management according to evidence-based guidelines at post-test (Adjusted Relative Risk = 1.0; 95% CI = 0.85 to 1.19) (p = 0.97).
Conclusions:
Specialist feed-back in addition to an educational session did not increase the uptake of anticoagulation in patients with AF.
Trial Registration:
ANZCTRN12611000076976 Retrospectively registered.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures

