Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 18, 2025

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
Published on: February 17, 2023
Population Pharmacokinetics Analysis of Quetiapine Extended-release Formulation in Japanese Patients with Bipolar
Risa Fukushi1, Yuki Nomura1, Masataka Katashima1
1Astellas Pharma Inc, Tokyo, Japan.
Purpose:
The objectives of this study were to explore covariates of plasma quetiapine concentrations after oral administration of quetiapine extended-release formulation (XR), and to examine the exposure-response relationship in Japanese patients with bipolar depression, using population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) modeling.
Methods:
In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of quetiapine XR in patients with bipolar depression, plasma for the measurement of quetiapine concentration was collected at weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 20, 28, and 52 during oral administration of 150 or 300 mg once daily of quetiapine XR before bedtime. A PopPK model of quetiapine XR was developed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling with first-order conditional estimation with interactions. The exposure-response relationship was examined using post-hoc exposures. The post-hoc AUC estimate was plotted against the change in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (ΔMADRS) total score from baseline to 8 weeks following once-daily doses at 300 mg.
Findings:
The final PopPK analysis dataset contained 322 patients and 1162 observations (cutoff data at week 28; cutoff date, February 2016). The plasma quetiapine concentration-time profile in patients with bipolar depression after oral administration of quetiapine XR was represented well using a 1-compartment with first-order absorption model. Covariate analysis led to the selection of γ-glutamyl transpeptidase on apparent oral clearance and body weight on apparent volume of distribution as covariates. The final population mean values of apparent oral clearance and apparent volume of distribution were 87.7 L/h and 277 L, respectively, and the interindividual %CVs were 32.6% and 75.0%, respectively.
Implications:
The effects of covariates on PK parameters were not large compared with the interindividual variability. In addition, there was no clear relationship between the AUC and ΔMADRS. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01725308.
Related Concept Videos
Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics: Dependence of Elimination Half-Life and Dose Clearance
A study on guinea pigs examined the...
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacokinetic Methods
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Excretion

