Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

222
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
222
Mathematical Modeling: Problem Solving01:29

Mathematical Modeling: Problem Solving

178
Mathematical modeling transforms real-world scenarios into mathematical expressions, allowing for structured problem-solving and analysis. This process involves defining the situation, assigning variables to measurable quantities, selecting an appropriate model, and solving the resulting equation. Such models are invaluable in finance, providing precise methods to evaluate investments, loans, and repayment structures.A widely used example is the calculation of fixed monthly payments on a loan,...
178
Statically Indeterminate Problem Solving01:16

Statically Indeterminate Problem Solving

624
Statically indeterminate problems are those where statics alone can not determine the internal forces or reactions. Consider a structure comprising two cylindrical rods made of steel and brass. These rods are joined at point B and restrained by rigid supports at points A and C. Now, the reactions at points A and C and the deflection at point B are to be determined. This rod structure is classified as statically indeterminate as the structure has more supports than are necessary for maintaining...
624
Application of Nonlinear Inequalities01:29

Application of Nonlinear Inequalities

148
A nonlinear inequality describes a comparison involving an expression that curves or behaves more complexly than a straight line. These inequalities often appear in forms that include squares, products, or variables in the denominator.To solve such an inequality, one starts by rewriting it so that zero appears on one side. For example, the inequality:  can be factored as: This form makes it easier to identify the values that cause the expression to equal zero. In this case, the...
148
Ampere-Maxwell's Law: Problem-Solving01:17

Ampere-Maxwell's Law: Problem-Solving

1.0K
A parallel-plate capacitor with capacitance C, whose plates have area A and separation distance d, is connected to a resistor R and a battery of voltage V. The current starts to flow at t = 0. What is the displacement current between the capacitor plates at time t? From the properties of the capacitor, what is the corresponding real current?
To solve the problem, we can use the equations from the analysis of an RC circuit and Maxwell's version of Ampère's law.
For the first part of the...
1.0K
Ampere's Law: Problem-Solving01:31

Ampere's Law: Problem-Solving

4.2K
Ampere's law states that for any closed looped path, the line integral of the magnetic field along the path equals the vacuum permeability times the current enclosed in the loop. If the fingers of the right hand curl along the direction of the integration path, the current in the direction of the thumb is considered positive. The current opposite to the thumb direction is considered negative.
Specific steps need to be considered while calculating the symmetric magnetic field distribution...
4.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The evidence base for ranger patrol effectiveness in conservation and how to improve it.

Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society·2026
Same author

Balancing land use for conservation, agriculture, and renewable energy.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Assessing the effectiveness of ontology-grounded AI term extraction using OntoGPT for environmental evidence synthesis.

Environmental evidence·2026
Same author

MSPA-informed SLEUTH urban growth modeling for green space protection in Ottawa.

PloS one·2025
Same author

North American bird declines are greatest where species are most abundant.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Expanding protected area coverage for migratory birds could improve long-term population trends.

Nature communications·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 18, 2025

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
11:53

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

13.3K

Exact integer linear programming solvers outperform simulated annealing for solving conservation planning problems.

Richard Schuster1,2, Jeffrey O Hanson3, Matthew Strimas-Mackey4

  • 1Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Peerj
|June 11, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Exact integer linear programming (EILP) solvers are more cost-effective and faster than Simulated Annealing (SA) for systematic conservation planning. EILP finds optimal solutions, reducing costs by 12-30% and improving processing times for biodiversity conservation.

Keywords:
Conservation planningInteger linear programmingMarxanOptimizationPrioritizationPrioritizr

More Related Videos

Predicting the Effectiveness of Population Replacement Strategy Using Mathematical Modeling
20:36

Predicting the Effectiveness of Population Replacement Strategy Using Mathematical Modeling

Published on: July 4, 2007

9.0K
A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle LNP Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models SVEM
13:54

A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle LNP Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models SVEM

Published on: August 18, 2023

5.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 18, 2025

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
11:53

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

13.3K
Predicting the Effectiveness of Population Replacement Strategy Using Mathematical Modeling
20:36

Predicting the Effectiveness of Population Replacement Strategy Using Mathematical Modeling

Published on: July 4, 2007

9.0K
A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle LNP Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models SVEM
13:54

A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle LNP Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models SVEM

Published on: August 18, 2023

5.6K

Area of Science:

  • Conservation Science
  • Operations Research
  • Biodiversity Management

Background:

  • Limited resources necessitate cost-effective strategies for biodiversity conservation.
  • Systematic conservation planning aims to maximize conservation objectives within budget constraints.
  • Simulated Annealing (SA) and exact integer linear programming (EILP) are key algorithms for conservation planning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the cost-effectiveness and processing times of SA (Marxan) and EILP algorithms for systematic conservation planning.
  • To evaluate the performance of EILP solvers using commercial and open-source options in a case study.
  • To assess the impact of spatial compactness on algorithm performance.

Main Methods:

  • Case study analysis in British Columbia, Canada.
  • Comparison of SA (Marxan) with various EILP solvers (commercial and open-source).
  • Evaluation of cost, processing time, and solution optimality, including boundary penalties for spatial compactness.

Main Results:

  • EILP-based conservation plans were 12-30% cheaper than SA-based plans.
  • The fastest EILP solver was 1,071 times faster than the tested SA algorithm.
  • EILP demonstrated performance advantages for both cost-efficiency and speed, even with spatial compactness constraints.

Conclusions:

  • EILP solvers offer significant advantages in cost-effectiveness and processing speed over SA for systematic conservation planning.
  • EILP's ability to find optimal solutions enhances conservation outcomes and reduces planning costs.
  • The efficiency of EILP enables real-time conservation planning, rapid sensitivity analysis, and supports transparent decision-making.