Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Differential effects of external noise and situational interest on neurophysiological responses during video based learning.

NPJ science of learning·2025

Same author

Challenges and Methods in Annotating Natural Speech for Neurolinguistic Research.

Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025

Same author

Attention Modulation to Linguistic Speech Units.

Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025

Same author

Neural Speech Tracking during Selective Attention: A Spatially Realistic Audiovisual Study.

eNeuro·2025

Same author

Selective attention and sensitivity to auditory disturbances in a virtually real classroom.

eLife·2025

Same author

Utility of Electroencephalograms for Enhancing Clinical Care and Rehabilitation of Children with Acquired Brain Injury.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 18, 2025

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

Irrelevant Predictions: Distractor Rhythmicity Modulates Neural Encoding in Auditory Cortex.

Shiri Makov¹, Elana Zion Golumbic¹

¹Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 5290002, Israel.

Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)

|June 11, 2020

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Predicting the timing of background sounds helps attention. Rhythmic distractor sounds improved target detection and reduced distractibility by enhancing neural responses to attended sounds.

Keywords:

MEG active sensing auditory attention dynamic attending theory rhythm

More Related Videos

Stereotactically-guided Ablation of the Rat Auditory Cortex, and Localization of the Lesion in the Brain

Stereotactically-guided Ablation of the Rat Auditory Cortex, and Localization of the Lesion in the Brain

Published on: October 11, 2017

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 18, 2025

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

Stereotactically-guided Ablation of the Rat Auditory Cortex, and Localization of the Lesion in the Brain

Stereotactically-guided Ablation of the Rat Auditory Cortex, and Localization of the Lesion in the Brain

Published on: October 11, 2017

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Area of Science:

Cognitive Neuroscience
Auditory Perception

Background:

Dynamic attending theory posits that temporal predictions enhance attention to sounds.
The role of temporal predictability in managing auditory distractors is not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate if temporal predictability of distractor sounds influences selective attention.
To examine the neural encoding of predictable versus unpredictable auditory distractors.

Main Methods:

A dichotic listening selective attention task was employed.
Temporal predictability of distractor sounds was manipulated (Rhythmic vs. Nonrhythmic).
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) was used to record neural responses.

Main Results:

Distractor rhythmicity modulated neural responses to both attended and distractor sounds.
Enhanced baseline activity and suppressed sensory responses were observed for Rhythmic distractors.
Target detection improved with Rhythmic distractors, alongside stronger neural lateralization to the attended ear.

Conclusions:

Temporal predictions are formed for task-irrelevant auditory stimuli.
Predictable distractors aid selective attention and reduce distractibility.
These findings highlight the functional role of predictive processing in auditory attention.