Incremental criterion validity of message perceptions and effects perceptions in the context of anti-smoking messages
Sabeeh A Baig1, Seth M Noar2,3, Nisha C Gottfredson4
1Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 325 Rosenau Hall CB 7440, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. sbaig1@alumni.jh.edu.
Abstract:
To select promising health messages, formative research has often relied on perceived message effectiveness (PME) scales assessing either of two related constructs, message perceptions (persuasive potential) and effects perceptions (potential for behavioral impact). We sought to examine their incremental criterion validity within a comparative framework. Participants were 703 U.S. adult smokers (ages [Formula: see text] 21) who received anti-smoking or comparable control (littering) messages on their cigarette packs for 3 weeks. Structural equation models examined both PME constructs as simultaneous correlates of outcomes from the UNC Tobacco Warnings Model. Message perceptions demonstrated incremental criterion validity with attention, an early behavioral antecedent ([Formula: see text] = 0.82, p < .001). Effects perceptions demonstrated incremental criterion validity with later behavioral antecedents (range [Formula: see text] = 0.74-0.87, all p < .01) and quitting behaviors ([Formula: see text] = 0.36-0.66, all p < .001). Formative research on anti-smoking messages may benefit from focusing on effects perceptions to characterize potential for behavior change.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Routes of Persuasion
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Social Proof
Framing Effects
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Self-Discrepancy Theory


