Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System

Health Information Technology (HIT)
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II

Nursing diagnoses represent a problem validated by major defining characteristics. There are four categories of nursing diagnoses: problem-focused, risk, health promotion or wellness, and syndrome. The anatomy of a nursing diagnosis includes three components: problem statement or diagnostic label, defining characteristics, and related factors.
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

A successful patient outcome depends mainly on the evaluation stage of the nursing process. Evaluation determines effectiveness by reviewing what was done previously after the completion of nursing interventions. Every time a healthcare professional steps in or administers treatment, they must reassess or evaluate the action to ensure the intended result. During the evaluation phase, there are three probable patient outcomes:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same authorSame journal

Evolution of Regional Information Infrastructures Integrating Health and Social Care in Scotland: Qualitative Study.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026

Same author

The Regional Implementation of an Electronic Health Record-Integrated Ambient Scribe in Primary and Secondary Care in England: Real-Time Qualitative Evaluation.

JMIR medical informatics·2026

Same author

Tocilizumab versus sarilumab among adults hospitalised with COVID-19: target trial emulation across England and Scotland.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

Analysis of Multilevel Factors Mobilizing the Spectrum of Interorganizational Knowledge Sharing for Facilitating Digital Transformation at Scale: Qualitative Study.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026

Same author

Community Health Participatory interventions in the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases including mental health in crisis-affected Low-and Middle-Income Countries - a scoping review.

Global health action·2026

Same author

How can we promote greater adoption of AI in healthcare?

BMJ quality & safety·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 18, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Developing and Applying a Formative Evaluation Framework for Health Information Technology Implementations:

Kathrin Cresswell¹, Robin Williams², Aziz Sheikh¹

¹Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Journal of Medical Internet Research

|June 11, 2020

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces the Technology, People, Organizations, and Macroenvironmental factors (TPOM) framework to address the need for better health information technology (HIT) evaluation. The TPOM framework guides implementers in understanding HIT implementation complexities.

Keywords:

evaluation health information technology sociotechnical

More Related Videos

Iterative Development of an Innovative Smartphone-Based Dietary Assessment Tool: Traqq

Iterative Development of an Innovative Smartphone-Based Dietary Assessment Tool: Traqq

Published on: March 19, 2021

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 18, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Iterative Development of an Innovative Smartphone-Based Dietary Assessment Tool: Traqq

Iterative Development of an Innovative Smartphone-Based Dietary Assessment Tool: Traqq

Published on: March 19, 2021

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

Area of Science:

Health Informatics
Information Systems Evaluation
Healthcare Management

Background:

Existing formative evaluation frameworks for health information technology (HIT) implementations lack comprehensiveness, intuitiveness, and usability.
A need exists for a structured approach to evaluate the multifaceted aspects of HIT implementations.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and apply a novel formative evaluation framework for health information technology (HIT) implementations.
To highlight interrelationships between key dimensions of HIT implementation and provide practical guidance for evaluators.

Main Methods:

Developed the Technology, People, Organizations, and Macroenvironmental factors (TPOM) framework.
Utilized qualitative data from three national formative evaluations of diverse HIT interventions (electronic health records, electronic prescribing, clinical decision support).
Analyzed data from 19 case studies across NHS England and NHS Scotland over 10 years, including interviews, observations, and document analysis.

Main Results:

The TPOM framework comprises interconnected dimensions and subthemes crucial for comprehensive evaluation.
Successful HIT implementation requires considering technological functionalities alongside social and organizational transformations.
External factors, including policy and market shifts, significantly influence technology adoption and usage within healthcare organizations.

Conclusions:

The TPOM framework offers a valuable tool for formative evaluations of HIT implementations and digital transformation initiatives.
Prospective application and validation of the TPOM framework are necessary to fully ascertain its utility and impact.