Socioeconomic Resource Environments in Biological and Alternative Family Care and Children's Cognitive Performance
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 18, 2025

Wheel Running and Environmental Complexity as a Therapeutic Intervention in an Animal Model of FASD
Published on: February 2, 2017
Sarah Font1, Marina Haddock Potter2
1Department of Sociology and Criminology, Pennsylvania State University, 505 Oswald Tower, University Park, PA 16801, Saf252@psu.edu, 814/863-2259.
Insights
Children
Area of Science:
- Child welfare research
- Developmental psychology
- Socioeconomic factors in child development
Background:
- Child protective services (CPS) involvement can impact a child's development.
- Understanding the role of a child's environment is crucial for effective interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between socioeconomic resources in children's environments and their cognitive performance.
- To determine if this association varies based on family care type for children investigated by CPS.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a national dataset of child protection investigations.
- Employed latent class analysis to create profiles of family resources (financial, parental education/employment, family structure).
- Examined associations between resource profiles and cognitive scores (math, reading) over time, by family care type.
Main Results:
- Identified four family resource environments: educated middle class, single earner, large working class, and severely disadvantaged.
- Family resource environments predicted cognitive performance and changes in performance.
- Associations were more consistent for children in biological family care.
Conclusions:
- Children remaining in home after maltreatment allegations may benefit from interventions addressing social and economic resources.
- Targeting environmental resources can support cognitive development in children involved with CPS.
Objective:
We examined social and economic resources in the environments of children involved with child protective services and their associations with children's cognitive performance.
Methods:
We used a national dataset of child protection investigations (children ages 6 to 16 at wave 1). Using latent class analysis, we constructed profiles of the financial resources, parental education and employment, and family structure and size. We then examined within- and across-time associations between resource environment profiles and children's math and reading scores, and tested whether associations differed by family care type.
Results:
Our latent class analysis identified four distinct family resource environments: educated middle class, single earner, large working class, and severely disadvantaged. Family resource environment profiles predicted current cognitive performance and changes in performance over time, but associations were more consistent for children in biological family care.
Conclusion:
Children who remain in home following maltreatment allegations may benefit from services that target social as well as economic resources.
More Related Videos
04:20Author Spotlight: Exploring Microglial Interactions with Stress-Response Circuitry Using the Limited Bedding and Nesting Model
Published on: July 12, 2024
08:08Author Spotlight: Capturing Infant-Caregiver Interactions Through Synchronized Multimodal Data Collection
Published on: May 31, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Environmental Influences on Intelligence
Information Processing Approach
Biological Influences on Intelligence
Impact of Social Context on Individuals
Relationship with Other Adult Family Members and Siblings
Causes of Social Behavior III: Biological and Environmental Influences