Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 18, 2025

Assessment of Vascular Function in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
Published on: June 16, 2014
Reporting quality of chronic kidney disease practice guidelines according to the RIGHT statement: a systematic
Yang Zhao1, Yanyan Li2, Junwei Li2
1Department of Pharmacy, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 3 Kangfuqian Street, Erqi District, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province 450052 China.
Insights
This study assessed chronic kidney disease (CKD) guideline reporting quality using the RIGHT checklist. Findings indicate moderate quality, with specific areas needing improvement for better guideline development.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Health Services Research
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- High-quality clinical practice guidelines are crucial for effective healthcare delivery.
- Chronic kidney disease (CKD) management relies heavily on evidence-based guidelines.
- Assessing the reporting quality of CKD guidelines is essential for their reliable implementation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reporting quality of chronic kidney disease (CKD) guidelines.
- To identify specific domains within guidelines that require enhanced reporting.
- To assess the utility of the RIGHT checklist in evaluating guideline quality.
Main Methods:
- A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and relevant websites was conducted for CKD guidelines published between 2008 and 2019.
- The Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) checklist was utilized by two independent reviewers.
- The reporting proportion for each guideline and across seven key domains was calculated.
Main Results:
- Thirteen CKD guidelines were included in the analysis.
- The average reporting quality score was 68.57%.
- Reporting proportions varied across domains, with 'background' scoring highest (81.73%) and 'review and quality assurance' lowest (53.85%).
Conclusions:
- CKD guidelines demonstrate moderate reporting quality, with notable deficiencies in basic information, evidence, and recommendations.
- Guideline developers are encouraged to improve reporting transparency and completeness.
- The RIGHT checklist serves as a valuable tool for enhancing the quality of practice guidelines.
Aim:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the reporting quality of chronic kidney disease (CKD) guidelines.
Methods:
PubMed, EMBASE, and guideline-related websites were searched from 2008 to 2019. The CKD guidelines were included. Two reviewers used the RIGHT (Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare) checklist to assess the quality of guidelines and calculate the reporting proportion of each guideline.
Results:
We included 13 guidelines, of which 30.8% (4/13) were developed in Europe and about two-thirds (8/13) were published on their own website. The average quality of the 13 guidelines was 68.57%. The reporting proportion of the seven domains (i.e. basic information; background; evidence; recommendations; review and quality assurance; funding and declaration and management of interests; other information) were 65.39%, 81.73%, 63.08%, 69.23%, 53.85%, 63.46%, and 61.54%, respectively.
Conclusion:
CKD guidelines had moderate reporting quality in some domains, but guideline developers should increase the reporting items in basic information, guideline evidence, and recommendations. The RIGHT checklist would be a useful tool to improve the reporting quality of guidelines.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Chronic Kidney Disease I: Introduction
Chronic Kidney Disease IV: Nursing Management
Chronic Kidney Disease II: Clinical Manifestations
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine Concentration
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention

