Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 18, 2025

Enhancing Tumor Content through Tumor Macrodissection
Published on: February 12, 2022
Impact of comorbidity and relative dose intensity on outcomes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with
Masakazu Yamamoto1,2, Ikuko Suzuki2, Kouji Saitou3
1Department of Neurology, Hematology, Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Insights
Comorbidity and relative dose intensity (RDI) impact survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Maintaining RDI of at least 70% may improve outcomes, particularly for elderly DLBCL patients.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Hematology
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Comorbidity and relative dose intensity (RDI) are known prognostic factors in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
- The combined impact of comorbidity and RDI on DLBCL patient survival has not been fully elucidated.
- Understanding these factors is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the independent and combined effects of comorbidity (using Charlson Comorbidity Index - CCI) and RDI on survival outcomes in DLBCL patients.
- To determine if RDI influences survival independently of comorbidity, particularly in elderly DLBCL patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 211 consecutive DLBCL patients treated between January 2010 and October 2018.
- Evaluation of clinical characteristics, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and relative dose intensity (RDI).
- Statistical analysis, including multivariate analysis, to assess the impact of CCI and RDI on event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS).
Main Results:
- Higher comorbidity (CCI ≥ 2) and lower RDI (< 70%) were both associated with poorer EFS and OS.
- Multivariate analysis indicated that RDI < 70% was an independent poor prognostic factor for OS in elderly DLBCL patients (age ≥ 65).
- Elderly patients with both high comorbidity (CCI ≥ 2) and low RDI (< 70%) exhibited the worst OS and EFS compared to other groups.
Conclusions:
- Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 2 is associated with poorer outcomes in DLBCL patients.
- Maintaining a relative dose intensity (RDI) of ≥ 70% may improve survival outcomes.
- RDI is a significant independent prognostic factor for overall survival in elderly DLBCL patients, underscoring its importance in treatment management.
Background:
Comorbidity and relative dose intensity (RDI) have been associated with survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients, but both relationships remain unaddressed in the same patients.
Methods:
A retrospective review of consecutive DLBCL patients treated from January 2010 to October 2018 was performed. Data for the clinical characteristics of the patients, including the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and RDI, on their outcomes were evaluated.
Results:
A total of 211 patients with a median age of 72 years (range 19-90 years) were analyzed. CCI ≥ 2 was associated with poor event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). RDI < 70% was associated with worse EFS and OS. A multivariate analysis revealed that RDI < 70% was only a poor risk factor for the reduction of OS in elderly DLBCL patients (65 years <) and independent from the presence of CCI. The relationship between CCI and RDI in elderly patients was analyzed in four groups, based on CCI ≥ 2 or less and RDI ≥ 70% or less. The group with CCI ≥ 2 and RDI < 70% had a poorer OS and EFS, as compared to the other three groups. The group with CCI < 2 and RDI ≥ 70% had a superior OS but an identical EFS, as compared to the two groups with CCI < 2 and RDI < 70% and CCI ≥ 2 and RDI ≥ 70%.
Conclusions:
CCI ≥ 2 was associated with a poorer outcome, but maintaining RDI ≥ 70% may improve the outcome, especially in elderly DLBCL patients.
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
