Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 18, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Diagnostic test accuracy of jolt accentuation for headache in acute meningitis in the emergency setting
Masahiro Iguchi1, Yoshinori Noguchi2, Shungo Yamamoto3
1Department of Neurology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Background:
Meningitis is inflammation of the meninges, the layers that protect the brain and spinal cord. Acute meningitis is an emergent disease that develops over the course of hours to several days. Delay in treatment can lead to serious outcomes. Inflammation of the meninges is assessed by analysing cerebrospinal fluid. Identifying the pathogen in cerebrospinal fluid is another way to diagnose meningitis. Cerebrospinal fluid is collected by doing a lumbar puncture, which is an invasive test, and can be avoided if a physical examination excludes the diagnosis of meningitis. However, most physical examinations, such as nuchal rigidity, Kernig's test, and Brudzinski's test, are not sufficiently sensitive to exclude meningitis completely. Jolt accentuation of headache is a new and less well-recognised physical examination, which assesses meningeal irritation. It is judged as positive if the headache is exacerbated by rotating the head horizontally two or three times per second. A 1991 observational study initially reported high sensitivity of this examination to predict pleocytosis. Pleocytosis, an abnormally high cerebrospinal fluid sample white cell count, is an accepted indicator of nervous system infection or inflammation. Jolt accentuation of headache may therefore accurately rule out meningitis without the use of lumbar puncture. However, more recent cross-sectional studies have reported variable diagnostic accuracy.
Objectives:
To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of jolt accentuation of headache for detecting acute meningitis in emergency settings. Secondary objectives: to investigate the sources of heterogeneity, including study population, patient condition, and types of meningitis.
Search Methods:
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (Ovid), and Embase (Elsevier) to 27 April 2020. We searched ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and Ichushi-Web Version 5.0 to 28 April 2020.
Selection Criteria:
We included cross-sectional studies that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of jolt accentuation of headache for people with suspected meningitis in emergency settings. We included participants of any age and any severity of illness. Meningitis should be diagnosed with any reference standard, such as cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis, proof of causative agents, or autopsy.
Data Collection And Analysis:
Two review authors independently collated study data. We assessed methodological quality of studies using QUADAS-2 criteria. We used a bivariate random-effects model to determine summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity where meta-analysis was possible. We performed sensitivity analyses to validate the robustness of outcomes. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.
Main Results:
We included nine studies (1161 participants). Five studies included only adults. Four studies included both adults and children; however, the proportion was not reported in three of these studies. The youngest child reported in the studies was aged 13 years. There was no study including only children. The reference standard was pleocytosis in eight studies, and the combination of pleocytosis and increased protein in the cerebrospinal fluid in one study. Two studies also used smear or positive culture of cerebrospinal fluid. Risk of bias and concern about applicability was high in the participant selection domain for all included studies and the consciousness subgroup. Overall, pooled sensitivity was 65.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 37.3 to 85.6), and pooled specificity was 70.4% (95% CI 47.7 to 86.1) (very low-certainty evidence). We established the possibility of heterogeneity from visual inspection of forest plots. However, we were unable to conduct further analysis for study population, types of meningitis, and participants' condition, other than disturbance of consciousness (a secondary outcome). Amongst participants whose consciousness was undisturbed (8 studies, 921 participants), pooled sensitivity and specificity were 75.2% (95% CI 54.3 to 88.6) and 60.8% (95% CI 43.4 to 75.9), respectively (very low-certainty evidence).
Authors' Conclusions:
Jolt accentuation for headache may exclude diagnoses of meningitis in emergency settings, but high-quality evidence to support use of this test is lacking. Even where jolt accentuation of headache is negative, there is still the possibility of acute meningitis. This review identified the possibility of heterogeneity. However, factors that contribute to heterogeneity are incompletely understood, and should be considered in future research.
Insights
Jolt accentuation of headache may help rule out meningitis in emergency settings, but evidence is limited. This physical exam is not a definitive test for acute meningitis, even when negative.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Infectious Diseases
- Diagnostic Medicine
Background:
- Meningitis, an inflammation of the meninges, is a serious condition requiring prompt diagnosis and treatment.
- Traditional diagnostic methods include cerebrospinal fluid analysis via lumbar puncture, an invasive procedure.
- Physical examinations like nuchal rigidity have limited sensitivity in excluding meningitis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of jolt accentuation of headache for acute meningitis in emergency settings.
- To explore sources of heterogeneity in diagnostic accuracy studies.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies assessing jolt accentuation of headache.
- Searches conducted in major databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase) up to April 2020.
- Inclusion of studies with various reference standards for meningitis diagnosis.
Main Results:
- Nine studies with 1161 participants were included, primarily assessing pleocytosis as the reference standard.
- Pooled sensitivity was 65.3% and pooled specificity was 70.4% (very low-certainty evidence).
- For patients with undisturbed consciousness, sensitivity was 75.2% and specificity 60.8% (very low-certainty evidence).
Conclusions:
- Jolt accentuation of headache shows potential for excluding meningitis but lacks high-quality supporting evidence.
- A negative test does not completely rule out acute meningitis.
- Further research is needed to understand and address heterogeneity in diagnostic accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Myasthenia Gravis: Diagnostic Tests
The edrophonium test is a diagnostic tool for myasthenia gravis. It involves...
Acute Pharyngitis
Acute pharyngitis is the inflammation of the back of the throat (pharynx), commonly resulting in a sore throat. It is a frequently encountered condition that prompts individuals to seek medical advice.
Classification
Acute pharyngitis can be categorized based on its underlying cause:
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Cranial and Spinal Meninges
Cranial Meninges
These meningeal layers cover the cranium. The dura mater is the outermost layer of cranial meninges. It is a thick and durable membrane of dense...

