Microaneurysms visualisation using five different optical coherence tomography angiography devices compared to

Salvatore Parrulli1, Federico Corvi2, Mariano Cozzi1

  • 1Eye Clinic, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Luigi Sacco, University of Milan, Milano, Italy.

Abstract

Insights

Fluorescein angiography (FA) remains superior for detecting retinal microaneurysms (MAs) in diabetic retinopathy (DR). While Spectralis OCTA detected more MAs, significant variability exists among optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) devices.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Diabetic Retinopathy Research

Background:

  • Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of vision loss.
  • Retinal microaneurysms (MAs) are early indicators of DR.
  • Accurate MA detection is crucial for DR management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Compare the diagnostic performance of fluorescein angiography (FA) and five optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) devices.
  • Evaluate the reproducibility of OCTA devices in detecting microaneurysms in diabetic retinopathy.
  • Assess the sensitivity and specificity of different OCTA devices for MA detection.

Main Methods:

  • Retinal imaging of 15 patients with DR using FA and five OCTA devices (Spectralis OCTA, PlexElite, RTVue XR Avanti, AngioPlex, DRI OCT Triton).
  • Standardized 3x3 volume scan pattern applied to all OCTA devices.
  • Microaneurysms (MAs) evaluated in both superficial (SCP) and deep (DCP) capillary plexuses.

Main Results:

  • FA detected significantly more MAs than any OCTA device.
  • Spectralis OCTA identified more MAs than other OCTA devices, particularly in the DCP.
  • DRI OCT Triton demonstrated the highest specificity (78.5%) and positive predictive value (83.3%) for MA detection.

Conclusions:

  • Fluorescein angiography (FA) remains the gold standard for visualizing retinal microaneurysms (MAs).
  • Spectralis OCTA showed higher MA detection rates, attributed to more B-scans and repeated scans.
  • Significant variability among OCTA devices necessitates careful consideration in clinical trials and practice.