Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genetic Screens02:46

Genetic Screens

5.5K
Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing  genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
5.5K
Multiple Allele Traits01:49

Multiple Allele Traits

37.7K
The Concept of Multiple Allelism
37.7K
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

3.0K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
3.0K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.7K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.7K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

13.9K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
13.9K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

3.4K
3.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Missing comparability: When genomic selection faces field variability. A case study in soybeans.

The plant genome·2026
Same author

Yield Performance, Combining Ability and Stability of Early- to Medium-Maturing Doubled-Haploid Maize Lines in Eastern Africa.

Plant breeding = Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenzuchtung·2026
Same author

Performance of doubled haploid maize (Zea mays L.) testcross hybrids under optimal and drought-stressed environments.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Multimodal genomic prediction is not a buzzword: why modern plant breeding must integrate genomics, enviromics, and phenomics.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same author

Introgression of QTL hotspot regions enhances grain yield and maize lethal necrosis resistance in elite maize lines.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Targeted knockout of a host peroxisomal peptidase confers field resistance to maize lethal necrosis.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Duplication-based genetic dissection of the Down syndrome critical region reveals its complex functional organization.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same journal

The complete sequence of the silkworm W chromosome uncovers its rapid evolution by large-scale duplications/deletions and translocation of W-linked genes.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same journal

Revisiting the genome assembly of Lupinus species reveals differential diploidization after a shared whole-genome duplication.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same journal

Deconstructing empirical fitness seascapes across scales of granularity.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same journal

Genomes of Conopholis americana and Epifagus virginiana: Two holoparasitic plants (Orobanchaceae).

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same journal

"A chromosome-level reference genome for the colonial marine hydrozoan Podocoryna americana".

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 18, 2025

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.5K

Genomic Prediction Enhanced Sparse Testing for Multi-environment Trials.

Diego Jarquin1, Reka Howard2, Jose Crossa3,4

  • 1University of Nebraska - Lincoln, Lincoln NE, 68583, j.crossa@cgiar.org diego.jarquin@gmail.com.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)
|June 13, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Genomic-enabled prediction models, especially those including genotype × environment interaction (GE), significantly improve sparse testing accuracy in plant breeding. This allows substantial savings in testing resources while maintaining predictive ability.

Keywords:
GenPredShared data resourcesallocation of non-overlapping/overlapping genotypes in environmentsgenomic-enabled prediction accuracygenotype-by-environment interaction GEmaize multi-environment trialsrandom cross-validationssparse testing methods

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

1.2K
Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons
08:04

Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons

Published on: June 6, 2025

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 18, 2025

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.5K
Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

1.2K
Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons
08:04

Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons

Published on: June 6, 2025

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Plant breeding and genetics
  • Agricultural science
  • Statistical genomics

Background:

  • Sparse testing in multi-environment breeding trials reduces costs and increases capacity by testing fewer genotypes per environment.
  • Genomic-enabled prediction models can predict unobserved genotype-in-environment combinations, but accuracy depends on overlap, testing frequency, and prediction method.
  • Optimizing sparse testing designs is crucial for efficient crop improvement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the predictive ability of different sparse testing designs using genomic-enabled prediction models.
  • To compare the performance of models with and without genotype × environment (GE) interaction.
  • To determine the impact of genotype overlap and calibration set size on prediction accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized two maize hybrid datasets with phenotypic yield data from three environments.
  • Implemented three prediction models: two main effects models (M1, M2) and one including GE interaction (M3).
  • Assessed various sparse testing designs, from no genotype overlap to complete overlap between environments.

Main Results:

  • The genome-based model including GE (M3) captured more phenotypic variation and showed higher prediction accuracy than M1 and M2.
  • Reducing calibration set size decreased prediction accuracy, but M3 was less affected.
  • Genomic-enabled models (M2, M3) recovered predictive ability when more genotypes were tested across environments.

Conclusions:

  • Genome-based models incorporating GE are effective for optimizing sparse testing designs in plant breeding.
  • Substantial savings in testing resources are achievable without compromising predictive accuracy.
  • Strategic design of sparse testing, informed by genomic prediction, enhances breeding program efficiency.