Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 18, 2025

Electrophysiological Assessment of Murine Atria with High-Resolution Optical Mapping
Published on: February 22, 2018
Novel Assessment of Accessory Pathway Function in Patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome
Louis J Rigos1, Joanna Stein Fishbein2, Andrew D Blaufox2
1ProHealth Pediatric Cardiology, 1 Dakota Drive, Suite 200, Lake Success, NY, 11042, USA. lrigos@Prohealthcare.com.
Abstract:
Surrogates for the shortest pre-excited R-R interval in atrial fibrillation (SPERRI) such as the accessory pathway effective refractory period (APERP) and shortest pre-excited paced cycle length (SPPCL) are flawed assessments of accessory pathway function in patients with WPW. Multi-extrastimulus pacing may have the theoretical advantage of more accurately mimicking the clinical reality of atrial fibrillation and thus may serve to better assess accessory pathway function. This cross-sectional study included 25 consecutive patients, aged ≤ 18 years, undergoing electrophysiology study for WPW. The longest S1S2, S2S3, S3S4 coupling intervals at which the antegrade AP refractoriness occurred, SPERRI, and SPPCL were recorded. Induction of atrial fibrillation was attempted in all patients and induced in 8 (32%, 4 SPERRIbaseline (265 ms ± 61 ms), 4 SPERRIIsuprel (258 ms ± 41 ms)). At baseline, the lower value of the S3ERP or S4ERP (274 ms ± 52 ms) was lower than the SPPCL (296 ms ± 54 ms, p < 0.0001) and APERP (296 ms ± 41 ms, p < 0.0001). More patients had S3ERP or S4ERP ≤ 250 ms (12/25, 48%) compared to those with APERP ≤ 250 ms (2/25 8%), p = 0.0016), SPPCL 5/24, 20%), p = 0.008 or either (6/25, 24%), p = 0.0143). With Isuprel, the lower value of the S3ERP or S4ERP (221 ms ± 36 ms) trended to be lower than the APERP (252 ms ± 36 ms, p = 0.0001) and the SPPCL (266 ms ± 57 ms, p = 0.001). With Isuprel, there was no statistical difference in the proportion of patients with S3ERP or S4ERP < 250 ms (12/16, 75%) compared to those with APERP ≤ 250 ms ((9/16, 56%), p = 0.08), SPPCL ≤ 250 ms ((9/16, 56%), p = 0.08), or either ((10/16, 63%), p = 0.16). Multi-extrastimulus pacing protocols demonstrate that accessory pathways are less refractory than as defined by single extrastimulus pacing and straight decremental pacing.
More Related Videos
08:05Optimization of Transesophageal Atrial Pacing to Assess Atrial Fibrillation Susceptibility in Mice
Published on: June 29, 2022
08:10Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Assessment of apical pulse
Assessing the apical pulse is a critical nursing procedure, particularly indicated for:
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History