Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Size constancy in children: a new interpretation.

J Shallo1, I Rock

  • 1Department of Strabismology and Neuroophthalmology, University of Göttingen, FRG.

Perception
|January 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

On the nature and order of organizational processing: A reply to Peterson.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Location and attention.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2001
Same author

Inattentional blindness as a function of proximity to the focus of attention.

Perception·1999
Same author

A belongingness principle of motion perception.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·1997
Same author

Retinal vs. environmental orientation in the perception of the right angle.

Acta psychologica·1995
Same journal

Predictive models and parameter analysis for multiple tactile perceptions in skin-wet fabrics interface.

Perception·2026
Same journal

High-resolution kitsch by AI: Why society needs art, not more AI content.

Perception·2026
Same journal

Benchmarking spatial discrimination thresholds of two-frame motion defined forms compared to luminance and stereoscopic defined forms.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The effect of face masks on the perception of trustworthiness and competence in individuals with autistic traits.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

Perception·2026
Same journal

Interoception, alexithymia, and motor congruency: Psychological drivers of body ownership in virtual reality.

Perception·2026
See all related articles

Children show differences in size constancy compared to adults at large distances. However, young children can accurately match sizes when visual angles are consistent, suggesting they access visual information more readily.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Existing evidence suggests age-related differences in size constancy, particularly at large observation distances.
  • This phenomenon is hypothesized to stem from variations in accessing proximal stimulus information, such as visual angle.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate age differences in size constancy.
  • To explore the role of proximal stimulus information (visual angle) in these age differences.
  • To determine if children's apparent underconstancy is due to an inability to use distance cues or a different access strategy.

Main Methods:

  • A traditional size constancy task was employed with varying observation distances.
  • A modified task was used where all comparison objects subtended the same visual angle.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Performance was compared between children and adults across both task variations.

    • Main Results:

    • Age differences in size constancy were observed in the traditional task.
    • These age differences diminished when comparison objects subtended identical visual angles.
    • Young children demonstrated the capacity for accurate size matching under specific visual angle conditions.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings suggest that children's size underconstancy may not be due to an inherent inability to utilize distance cues.
    • Children appear to access proximal stimulus information, like visual angle, more spontaneously than adults.
    • This difference in spontaneous access may explain previously reported age discrepancies in size constancy.