Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 18, 2025

ADSC-sheet Transplantation to Prevent Stricture after Extended Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Published on: February 10, 2017
The Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool can predict malnutrition in patients with esophageal achalasia
Pamela Milito1, Krizia Aquilino1, Veronica Lazzari1
1Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General and Foregut Surgery, University of Milan, Milano.
Background:
At present, little research has been done to clarify why some achalasia patients do not lose weight or are even obese and to investigate their nutritional status. The aim of this study was to identify predictive factors of malnutrition in these patients and to assess their response to treatment.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective cohort study on consecutive patients referred to a tertiary-care center for laparoscopic or endoscopic treatment of achalasia. Demographics, anthropometric variables, presenting symptoms, and results of the objective investigation were recorded on a prospectively collected database. The severity of symptoms and the nutritional risk were assessed by the Eckardt score and the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), respectively, before and after treatment.
Results:
Between 2013 and 2019, 171 patients met the study inclusion criteria. There were 87 (50.9%) male and the median age was 53.0 (39-66) years. The median Eckardt score was 6 (interquartile range 3). Based on the MUST score, 121 (70.8%) patients were classified at moderate/high risk of malnutrition. Of these, 93 (76.9%) were overweight or obese. Compared to low-risk group, predictive factors of moderate/high risk of malnutrition were higher Eckardt score [odds ratio (OR) 1.63; 95% CI, 1.35-1.99], more severe dysphagia (OR 2.68, 95% CI, 1.66-4.30), and greater absolute weight loss (OR 2.37; 95% CI, 1.77-3.17). The latter was the only independent predictive factor of malnutrition (OR 2.54; 95% CI, 1.69-3.82). After treatment, the measured MUST score was 0 in 96% of patients.
Conclusions:
Over 70% of achalasia patients were at moderate/high risk of malnutrition. These individuals may benefit from a perioperative multidisciplinary approach including dietary intervention to stabilize weight and improve their nutritional status.
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Anorexia Nervosa
Symptoms and Physical Effects
Individuals with anorexia nervosa commonly exhibit extreme...

