Calculating and Characterizing the Charge Distributions in Solids
Indrani Choudhuri1, Donald G Truhlar1
1Department of Chemistry, Chemical Theory Center, and Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
|June 17, 2020
Summary
Estimating partial atomic charges on transition metals is crucial for material properties. Charge model choice significantly impacts results more than density functional choice, with Bader charges highest and Hirshfeld charges lowest.
Area of Science:
- Computational materials science
- Solid-state chemistry
- Quantum chemistry
Background:
- Accurate partial atomic charges on metal centers are vital for understanding material electronic and catalytic properties.
- Discrepancies in charge calculation methods are well-documented for molecules but less so for solid materials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically investigate the impact of various density functionals and charge models on partial atomic charges of transition metal centers in solids.
- To compare the performance of different computational approaches for calculating metal center charges in diverse solid-state systems.
Main Methods:
- Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed using multiple functionals (PBE, PBE+U, TPSS, revTPSS, HLE17, revM06-L, B3LYP, B3LYP*).
- Four charge models were employed: Bader, Hirshfeld, CM5, and DDEC6.
- A test set of 18 solids was used, including 12 nonmagnetic metal oxides, sulfides, and selenides (MX2), and 6 ferromagnetic transition metal complexes.
Main Results:
- Bader charges were consistently the highest, while Hirshfeld charges were the lowest across all tested systems and functionals.
- Charge model selection exhibited a greater variation in results than the choice of density functional.
- Metal center charges were sensitive to Hubbard U parameters in PBE+U and Hartree-Fock exchange percentage in modified B3LYP functionals, generally increasing with higher values.
Conclusions:
- The choice of charge model is a dominant factor influencing partial atomic charge calculations for transition metal centers in solids.
- PBE+U with appropriate U parameters and certain meta-GGA functionals like HLE17 show promise for accurate charge estimations, comparable to hybrid functionals like B3LYP.
- Further studies are needed to establish standardized best practices for charge calculations in solid-state materials.
Related Concept Videos
Continuous Charge Distributions
7.8K
Imagine a bucket of water. It contains many molecules, of the order of 1026 molecules. Thus, although it contains discrete elements (molecules) at the microscopic level, macroscopically, it can be considered continuous. Small volume elements of water, infinitesimal compared to the bulk of the bucket's volume, still contain many molecules. Under this framework, quantized matter is approximated as continuous for practical purposes.
The electric charge can also be subjected to an analogical...
The electric charge can also be subjected to an analogical...
7.8K
Electric Field of a Charged Disk
3.0K
The simplest case of a surface charge distribution is the uniformly charged disk. Calculating its electric field also helps us calculate the electric field of a large plane of charge.
The system's symmetry is in the cylindrical directions across the plane of the charge. As a result, the electric fields created by various surface charge elements nullify each other in the direction parallel to the surface. Thereby, the resulting electric field is perpendicular to the plane. Since the disk is...
The system's symmetry is in the cylindrical directions across the plane of the charge. As a result, the electric fields created by various surface charge elements nullify each other in the direction parallel to the surface. Thereby, the resulting electric field is perpendicular to the plane. Since the disk is...
3.0K
Charge on a Conductor
5.2K
An interesting property of a conductor in static equilibrium is that extra charges on the conductor end up on its outer surface, regardless of where they originate. Consider a hollow metallic conductor with a uniform surface charge density. Since the conductor itself is in electrostatic equilibrium, there should not be any electric field inside the conductor. Now, assume a Gaussian surface enclosing the hollow portion. Applying Gauss's law, the inner surface of the hollow conductor will not...
5.2K
Energy Associated With a Charge Distribution
1.8K
The work done to bring a charge through a distance r is given by the potential difference between the initial and the final position. To assemble a collection of point charges, the total work done can be expressed in terms of the product of each pair of charges divided by their separation distance, defined with respect to a suitable origin. Solving this expression gives the energy stored in a point charge distribution.
1.8K
Calculations of Electric Potential I
2.5K
Consider a ring of radius R with a uniform charge density λ. What will the electric potential be at point M, which is located on the axis of the ring at a distance x from the center of the ring?
The ring is divided into infinitesimal small arcs such that point M is equidistant from all the arcs. Here, the cylindrical coordinate system is used to calculate the electric potential at point M. A general element of the arc between angles θ and θ + dθ is of the length Rdθ and has a charge of...
The ring is divided into infinitesimal small arcs such that point M is equidistant from all the arcs. Here, the cylindrical coordinate system is used to calculate the electric potential at point M. A general element of the arc between angles θ and θ + dθ is of the length Rdθ and has a charge of...
2.5K
Potential Due to a Polarized Object
658
A neutral atom consists of a positively charged nucleus surrounded by a negatively charged electron cloud. When placed in an external electric field, the external electric force pulls the electrons and nucleus apart, opposite to the intrinsic attraction between the nucleus and the electrons. The opposing forces balance each other with a slight shift between the center of masses of the nucleus and the electron cloud, resulting in a polarized atom. On the other hand, a few molecules, like water,...
658


