Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 18, 2025

Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
Published on: March 24, 2019
Spin-chain correlations in the frustrated triangular lattice material CuMnO2
Simon A J Kimber1, Andrew R Wildes2, Hannu Mutka2
1ICB-Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne, Université Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Université de Bourgogne, Bâtiment Sciences Mirande, 9 Avenue Alain Savary, B-P 47870, 21078 Dijon Cedex, France.
None:
The Ising triangular lattice remains the classic test-case for frustrated magnetism. Here we report neutron scattering measurements of short range magnetic order in CuMnO2, which consists of a distorted lattice of Mn3+spins with single-ion anisotropy. Physical property measurements on CuMnO2are consistent with 1D correlations caused by anisotropic orbital occupation. However the diffuse magnetic neutron scattering seen in powder measurements has previously been fitted by 2D Warren-type correlations. Using neutron spectroscopy, we show that paramagnetic fluctuations persist up to ∼25 meV aboveTN= 65 K. This is comparable to the incident energy of typical diffractometers, and results in a smearing of the energy integrated signal, which hence cannot be analysed in the quasi-static approximation. We use low energy XYZ polarised neutron scattering to extract the purely magnetic (quasi)-static signal. This is fitted by reverse Monte Carlo analysis, which reveals that two directions in the triangular layers are perfectly frustrated in the classical spin-liquid phase at 75 K. Strong antiferromagnetic correlations are only found along theb-axis, and our results hence unify the pictures seen by neutron scattering and macroscopic physical property measurements.
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Ferromagnetism
Trends in Lattice Energy: Ion Size and Charge
Network Covalent Solids
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...

