Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 18, 2025

10:12
Systemic Bacterial Infection and Immune Defense Phenotypes in Drosophila Melanogaster
Published on: May 13, 2015
25.2K
Multiple phenotypes conferred by a single insect symbiont are independent
A H C McLean1, J Hrček1, B J Parker1
1Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK.
Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|June 18, 2020
Summary
Microbial symbionts can offer insect hosts protection against pathogens and parasitoids. Studies show these symbiont-mediated benefits, like protection and male-killing, can evolve independently without fitness trade-offs.
Area of Science:
- Microbial ecology
- Insect-microbe interactions
- Evolutionary biology
Background:
- Microbial symbionts often confer multiple, diverse phenotypes on their animal hosts.
- Understanding how these symbiont-mediated phenotypes interact to influence host fitness is crucial but remains poorly understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate potential correlations between different symbiont-mediated phenotypes in insect hosts.
- To determine if symbiont-induced protection against various natural enemies and effects on host reproduction are linked.
Main Methods:
- Utilized 11 strains of the bacterial symbiont Spiroplasma infecting pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum).
- Assessed Spiroplasma-mediated protection against the fungal pathogen Pandora neoaphidis and parasitoids Aphidius ervi and Praon volucre.
- Evaluated the impact of five Spiroplasma strains on male offspring production (male-killing).
Main Results:
- All but one Spiroplasma strain conferred strong protection against the parasitoid Praon volucre.
- Variable protection against Pandora neoaphidis and Aphidius ervi was observed, consistent with prior research.
- Male-killing was also a variable phenotype among the tested Spiroplasma strains.
- No significant correlations, positive or negative, were found between the different symbiont-mediated phenotypes.
- Symbiont phylogeny did not correlate with the observed protective phenotypes.
Conclusions:
- Multiple symbiont-mediated phenotypes can evolve independently in insect hosts.
- There is no evidence of trade-offs between symbiont-induced protection against different enemies and effects on host reproduction.
- Spiroplasma symbionts demonstrate the potential for independent evolution of diverse host-beneficial traits.
Related Concept Videos
Law of Independent Assortment
61.9K
While Mendel’s Law of Segregation states that the two alleles for one gene are separated into different gametes, a different question of how different genes are inherited remains. For example, is the gene for tall plants inherited with the gene for green peas? Mendel asked this question by experimenting with a dihybrid cross; a cross in which both parents are homozygous for two distinct traits resulting in an F1 generation that are heterozygous for both traits.
61.9K
Symbiosis
36.6K
Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
36.6K
Dihybrid Crosses
80.5K
Overview
80.5K
Multiple Allele Traits
37.7K
The Concept of Multiple Allelism
37.7K
Incomplete Dominance
29.4K
Gregor Mendel's work (1822 - 1884) was primarily focused on pea plants. Through his initial experiments, he determined that every gene in a diploid cell has two variants called alleles inherited from each parent. He suggested that amongst these two alleles, one allele is dominant in character and the other recessive. The combination of alleles determines the phenotype of a gene in an organism.
29.4K
Law of Segregation
77.1K
When crossing pea plants, Mendel noticed that one of the parental traits would sometimes disappear in the first generation of offspring, called the F1 generation, and could reappear in the next generation (F2). He concluded that one of the traits must be dominant over the other, thereby causing masking of one trait in the F1 generation. When he crossed the F1 plants, he found that 75% of the offspring in the F2 generation had the dominant phenotype, while 25% had the recessive phenotype.
77.1K

