Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 18, 2025

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
Published on: September 20, 2018
Using systematic data categorisation to quantify the types of data collected in clinical trials: the DataCat project
Evelyn Crowley1, Shaun Treweek2, Katie Banister3
1Health Research Board Clinical Research Facility, University of Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Background:
Data collection consumes a large proportion of clinical trial resources. Each data item requires time and effort for collection, processing and quality control procedures. In general, more data equals a heavier burden for trial staff and participants. It is also likely to increase costs. Knowing the types of data being collected, and in what proportion, will be helpful to ensure that limited trial resources and participant goodwill are used wisely.
Aim:
The aim of this study is to categorise the types of data collected across a broad range of trials and assess what proportion of collected data each category represents.
Methods:
We developed a standard operating procedure to categorise data into primary outcome, secondary outcome and 15 other categories. We categorised all variables collected on trial data collection forms from 18, mainly publicly funded, randomised superiority trials, including trials of an investigational medicinal product and complex interventions. Categorisation was done independently in pairs: one person having in-depth knowledge of the trial, the other independent of the trial. Disagreement was resolved through reference to the trial protocol and discussion, with the project team being consulted if necessary.
Key Results:
Primary outcome data accounted for 5.0% (median)/11.2% (mean) of all data items collected. Secondary outcomes accounted for 39.9% (median)/42.5% (mean) of all data items. Non-outcome data such as participant identifiers and demographic data represented 32.4% (median)/36.5% (mean) of all data items collected.
Conclusion:
A small proportion of the data collected in our sample of 18 trials was related to the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes accounted for eight times the volume of data as the primary outcome. A substantial amount of data collection is not related to trial outcomes. Trialists should work to make sure that the data they collect are only those essential to support the health and treatment decisions of those whom the trial is designed to inform.
More Related Videos
11:18Generation of Comprehensive Thoracic Oncology Database - Tool for Translational Research
Published on: January 22, 2011
16:23Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
Published on: February 26, 2014
Related Concept Videos
How Data are Classified: Categorical Data
Data are classified based on whether they are measurable or not. Categorical data cannot be measured; instead, it can be divided into categories. For example, if Y denotes a person's party affiliation, some examples of Y include...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Data Collection by Experiments
An example of the experimental method is a public...
Data Collection I
Clinical Trials: Overview
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials