Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 18, 2025

08:15
Reverse Dissection and DiceCT Reveal Otherwise Hidden Data in the Evolution of the Primate Face
Published on: January 7, 2019
7.2K
Risk sensitivity, phylogenetic reconstruction, and four chimpanzees.
Ken Sayers1, Charles R Menzel1
1Language Research Center, Georgia State University, 3401 Panthersville Rd., Decatur GA 30034 U.S.A.
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
|June 19, 2020
Summary
Chimpanzee risk preferences for food rewards varied significantly based on individual subjects and experimental conditions. Mean food quantity, rather than variance, better predicted choices in some foraging tasks.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Ecology
- Primate Cognition
- Evolutionary Psychology
Background:
- Risk sensitivity is crucial for economic decision-making and primate behavior.
- Existing studies often use limited experimental designs (dichotomous choices, small scales).
- This limits understanding of how variance information is applied across diverse contexts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate foraging risk sensitivity in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).
- To assess how chimpanzee risk preferences vary across different experimental contexts and reward structures.
- To evaluate the adequacy of current experimental strategies for understanding primate risk traits.
Main Methods:
- Four chimpanzees participated in indoor dichotomous choice tests with food rewards of varying means and variances.
- Subsequent tasks included different food types, rank-ordering containers, and outdoor recovery tests.
- Memory for hidden containers was also assessed in some variations.
Main Results:
- Chimpanzee risk preferences were not consistent, varying by individual, context, reward type, and mean reward quantity.
- In rank-ordering tasks, mean food quantity was a stronger predictor of selection than reward variance.
- This challenges the identification of generalized, species-typical primate risk traits.
Conclusions:
- Current experimental approaches may be insufficient for reconstructing primate risk-related traits.
- Classical foraging models' success may stem from incorporating robust predictive variables like mean reward, not variance.
- Further research across diverse contexts is needed to understand the role of variance in naturalistic decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Synteny and Evolution
3.6K
John H. Renwick first coined the term “synteny” in 1971, which refers to the genes present on the same chromosomes, even if they are not genetically linked. The species with common ancestry tend to show conserved syntenic regions. Therefore, the concept of synteny is nowadays used to describe the evolutionary relationship between species.
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...
3.6K
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
6.7K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
6.7K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
7.8K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
In contrast, regions which code...
7.8K
Phylogenetic Trees
49.0K
Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.
49.0K
Phylogeny
56.4K
Phylogeny is concerned with the evolutionary diversification of organisms or groups of organisms. A group of organisms with a name is called a taxon (singular). Taxa (plural) can span different levels of the evolutionary hierarchy. For instance, the group containing all birds is a taxon (comprising the class Aves), and the group of all species of daisies (the genus Bellis) is a taxon. Phylogenies can likewise include just one genus (i.e., depict species relationships) or span an entire kingdom.
56.4K
Speciation Rates
22.4K
Overview
22.4K

