Implementation of a restrictive blood transfusion protocol in a gynecologic oncology service

Jaron Mark1, Sarah Lynam1, Kayla Morrell2

  • 1Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA.

Gynecology and Reproductive Endocrinology
|June 19, 2020
PubMed

Insights

Implementing a restrictive blood transfusion protocol in gynecologic oncology patients significantly reduced red blood cell transfusions and surgical site infections. This approach also led to a shorter hospital stay, improving patient outcomes post-surgery.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Hematology
  • Surgical Outcomes

Background:

  • Postoperative anemia is common in gynecologic oncology patients.
  • Blood transfusions carry inherent risks and costs.
  • Optimizing transfusion strategies is crucial for patient recovery and safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of a restrictive blood transfusion protocol.
  • To assess changes in transfusion rates and postoperative morbidity.
  • To analyze outcomes in gynecologic oncology patients before and after protocol implementation.

Main Methods:

  • A restrictive blood transfusion protocol was implemented in January 2014.
  • Transfusions were restricted to hemoglobin <7.0 g/dL or hematocrit <21.0% in one-unit increments.
  • Patient data were collected from July 2011 to December 2016, comparing pre- and post-protocol periods.

Main Results:

  • A total of 1482 patients were analyzed (755 pre-protocol, 727 post-protocol).
  • Restrictive protocol patients showed decreased red blood cell transfusion rates (11.0% vs 5.9%, p<0.001).
  • Significant reductions were observed in superficial (7.7% vs 4.1%, p=0.005) and deep surgical site infections (2.3% vs 0.7%, p=0.02), and length of stay (3.0 vs 2.0 days, p<0.001).

Conclusions:

  • A restrictive blood transfusion protocol effectively reduces transfusion rates in gynecologic oncology patients.
  • This protocol is associated with decreased postoperative morbidity, including surgical site infections.
  • The findings support the adoption of restrictive transfusion strategies to improve outcomes in this patient population.
Abstract