Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 18, 2025

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Adherence to Adalimumab Was Not Improved by a Reminder-Based Intervention with an Electronic Needle Container
Johannes P D Schultheiss1, Sandra Altena2, Max R Clevers2
1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO box L00.418, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. j.p.d.schultheiss-7@umcutrecht.nl.
Background:
Adherence to adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients is reported to be below par. Non-adherence may result in loss-of-response and increased hospitalization. We analyzed the effect of an electronic needle container (ENC) on adherence to adalimumab.
Methods:
In this multicenter, 12-months observational study, we included adalimumab treated IBD patients. All patients were invited to receive an ENC. Patients who declined or did not complete the registration for an ENC served as controls. Primary endpoint was whether an ENC increased adherence, calculated from pharmacy refills as proportion of days covered (PDC). Secondary endpoints were clinical outcomes, including loss-of-response, identification of predictors of adherence and correlation between different modalities for measuring adherence. Loss-of-response was defined as a disease flare, dose-escalation or IBD-related hospitalization or surgery.
Results:
The pharmacies' records identified 198 eligible patients, of whom 32 were excluded. The ENC was supplied to 69 patients, the remaining 97 patient formed the control group. Median baseline PDC (98.4% vs. 96.1%, p = 0.047) and the proportion of adherent (PDC ≥ 86%) patients (87.0% vs. 74.2%, p = 0.045) was higher for the ENC group. The ENC did not improve the adherence of patients during follow-up (odds ratio 1.26, 95% CI 0.55-2.86). During follow-up, five (7.2%) patients in the ENC group and 13 (13.4%) in the control group discontinued adalimumab (log-rank p = 0.22). Loss-of-response occurred in 12 (17.4%) and 14 (14.4%) patients, respectively (log-rank p = 0.66).
Conclusions:
Our results show no beneficial effect of a reminder-based intervention on adherence or treatment outcomes.
More Related Videos
08:27Dynamic Adhesion Assay for the Functional Analysis of Anti-adhesion Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Published on: September 20, 2018
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Repetitive IV Injections
Drug Dosage Regimen: Overview
Typically, the starting dose and dosing interval are guided by the manufacturer's recommendations based on clinical trials conducted during and after drug...
Drug Delivery: Parenteral Route
There are three primary parenteral routes: intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), and subcutaneous (SC). The IV route introduces the drug directly into the bloodstream, ensuring immediate action. The IM route...
Drug Therapy
Antianxiety Medications