Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Implicit learning of social information in contextual cueing.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
Same author

Temporal structure in visual working memory: Contributions of relative order and item-interval associations.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Sustained Attention Task (gradCPT) Dataset using simultaneous EEG-fMRI and DTI.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Contours drive distinct orientation selectivity in the human visual system.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Fabrication of a Master Mold for Microneedles with a Micron-sized Air-vent Hole.

Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE·2025
Same author

Spatiotemporal position overlap disrupts feature binding in visual working memory.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 18, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.2K

Simple action planning can affect attentional allocation in subsequent visual search.

Seohee Han1, Eunhee Ji1, Eunhye Choe1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Yonsei University, 50, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|June 20, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Planning an action, even without performing it, can bias attention to an object's irrelevant features. This cognitive process influences subsequent visual search tasks, similar to actual physical action.

Keywords:
Action effectAction planningAttentionVisual search

More Related Videos

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.4K
Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model
06:30

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model

Published on: May 24, 2019

5.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 18, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.2K
Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.4K
Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model
06:30

Spotlighting Customers' Visual Attention at the Stock, Shelf and Store Levels with the 3S Model

Published on: May 24, 2019

5.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Action

Background:

  • Mental representations of actions impact task performance without overt execution.
  • Cognitive processes preceding action execution may influence attention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if pre-action cognitive planning induces attentional bias towards irrelevant task dimensions.
  • To compare the attentional effects of action planning versus physical action execution.

Main Methods:

  • Participants engaged in independent action planning and visual search tasks.
  • Action planning involved preparing an action response to an object.
  • Attentional bias was measured by object feature prioritization in a subsequent search task.

Main Results:

  • Object features planned for action were prioritized in a later search task, irrespective of relevance.
  • Action planning without physical execution induced attentional bias comparable to actual action.
  • This bias extended to features irrelevant to the task or intended action.

Conclusions:

  • Action planning, independent of physical execution, can create attentional biases.
  • Cognitive preparation for action influences perception and attention to irrelevant object features.
  • These findings highlight the significant role of mental action simulation in attentional processes.