Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 18, 2025

11:15
Next Generation Sequencing for the Detection of Actionable Mutations in Solid and Liquid Tumors
Published on: September 20, 2016
24.8K
Technical Evaluation of Commercial Mutation Analysis Platforms and Reference Materials for Liquid Biopsy Profiling
Sabrina Weber1,2, Benjamin Spiegl1, Samantha O Perakis1
1Institute of Human Genetics, Diagnostic & Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Medical University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Cancers
|June 21, 2020
Summary
Molecular profiling using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) shows promise for cancer management. However, extensive validation is crucial due to significant variability observed in Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) assays.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Diagnostics
- Genomics
Background:
- Liquid biopsies, particularly cell-free DNA (cfDNA), offer a less invasive alternative to tissue biopsies for cancer detection and monitoring.
- Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) cfDNA assays are increasingly used in clinical practice, but their clinical validity and utility require further proof.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of commercially available reference materials and cfDNA from Diagnostic Leukaphereses (DLA) for assessing mutation analysis platforms.
- To compare the inter- and intra-assay, and intra- and inter-laboratory performance of various cfDNA testing methods.
Main Methods:
- Utilized commercially available reference materials and DLA samples in three experimental setups.
- Tested a range of assays including digital droplet PCR (ddPCR), MassARRAY, and various NGS-based assays.
- Performed inter- and intra-assay, and intra- and inter-laboratory comparisons.
Main Results:
- Both reference materials with predetermined variant allele frequencies (VAFs) and DLA samples proved highly useful for performance assessment.
- Demonstrated substantial variability in sensitivity and specificity among different NGS assays.
- Highlighted the critical need for extensive test performance validation.
Conclusions:
- Reference materials and DLA samples are valuable tools for validating cfDNA mutation analysis platforms.
- Significant variability in NGS assay performance underscores the necessity of rigorous validation before clinical implementation.
- Further standardization and validation are essential for reliable cfDNA testing in cancer care.
Keywords:
assay validationcell-free DNAcfDNAcirculating tumor DNActDNAdiagnostic leukapheresesmolecular profilingmutation analysisperformance assessmentreference material
