Delivering genome sequencing for rapid genetic diagnosis in critically ill children: parent and professional views, experiences and challenges
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 17, 2025

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
Published on: April 4, 2018
Melissa Hill1,2, Jennifer Hammond3,4, Celine Lewis3,4
1North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. melissa.hill@ucl.ac.uk.
Insights
Rapid genomic sequencing (RGS) offers clinical and emotional benefits for critically ill children, but parental stress and concerns require careful pre-test counseling and support during the diagnostic process.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Pediatric critical care
- Medical ethics
Background:
- Rapid genomic sequencing (RGS) is an emerging diagnostic tool for critically ill children.
- Understanding parent and professional perspectives is crucial for effective implementation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore parent and professional views on the utility, potential harms, and service delivery challenges of RGS in critically ill children.
- To inform the wider clinical implementation of RGS.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with parents (n=11) and healthcare professionals (n=19) involved in the Rapid Paediatric Sequencing (RaPS) study.
- Interviews explored experiences with RGS for diagnosing monogenic disorders in critically ill children.
Main Results:
- Participants generally held positive views on RGS, citing clinical and emotional benefits of rapid diagnosis.
- Parental stress significantly impacts decision-making, with heightened concerns during RGS offering and waiting periods.
- Multidisciplinary teamwork is essential for efficient RGS service delivery.
Conclusions:
- RGS is perceived as valuable for critically ill children, offering significant benefits.
- Informed parental decision-making requires careful pre-test counseling and additional support during the waiting period.
- Education for mainstream clinicians is necessary to facilitate broader clinical adoption of RGS.
Abstract:
Rapid genomic sequencing (RGS) is increasingly being used in the care of critically ill children. Here we describe a qualitative study exploring parent and professional perspectives around the usefulness of this test, the potential for unintended harms and the challenges for delivering a wider clinical service. The Rapid Paediatric Sequencing (RaPS) study offered trio RGS for diagnosis of critically ill children with a likely monogenic disorder. Main and actionable secondary findings were reported. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with parents of children offered RGS (n = 11) and professionals (genetic clinicians, non-genetic clinicians, scientists and consenters) (n = 19) by telephone (parents n = 10/professionals n = 1) or face-to-face (parents n = 1/professionals n = 18). We found that participants held largely positive views about RGS, describing clinical and emotional benefits from the opportunity to obtain a rapid diagnosis. Parental stress surrounding their child's illness complicates decision making. Parental concerns are heightened when offered RGS and while waiting for results. The importance of multidisciplinary team working to enable efficient delivery of a rapid service was emphasised. Our findings give insight into the perceived value of RGS for critically ill children. Careful pre-test counselling is needed to support informed parental decision making. Many parents would benefit from additional support while waiting for results. Education of mainstream clinicians is required to facilitate clinical implementation.
Related Concept Videos
Next-generation Sequencing
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
Genomics
What is Genetic Engineering?

