Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Estimating Population Standard Deviation01:26

Estimating Population Standard Deviation

3.2K
When the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is large, the sample standard deviation s is commonly used as a point estimate of σ. However, it can sometimes under or overestimate the population standard deviation. To overcome this drawback, confidence intervals are determined to estimate population parameters and eliminate any calculation bias accurately. However, this only applies to random samples from normally distributed populations. Knowing the sample mean and...
3.2K
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

9.5K
To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...
9.5K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

8.7K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
8.7K
Calculating Standard Deviation01:08

Calculating Standard Deviation

11.7K
The standard deviation is the most common measure of variation. It is a value that tells us how far a data value is from the mean value in a dataset. Further, the standard deviation is always a positive value or zero.
The standard deviation value is small when all the data is concentrated close to the mean. Here the data exhibits low variation. The standard deviation value is larger when the data values are more spread out from the mean. Here, the data displays high...
11.7K
Range Rule of Thumb to Interpret Standard Deviation01:13

Range Rule of Thumb to Interpret Standard Deviation

12.7K
The range rule of thumb in statistics helps us calculate a dataset's minimum and maximum values with known standard deviation. This rule is based on the concept that 95% of all values in a dataset lie within two standard deviations from the mean.
For instance, the range rule of thumb can be used to find the tallest and the shortest student in a class, given the mean student height and standard deviation. If the mean student height is 1.6 m and the standard deviation, s is 0.05 m, the height...
12.7K
Sampling Distribution01:12

Sampling Distribution

16.4K
Given simple random samples of size n from a given population with a measured characteristic such as mean, proportion, or standard deviation for each sample, the probability distribution of all the measured characteristics is called a sampling distribution. How much the statistic varies from one sample to another is known as the sampling variability of a statistic. You typically measure the sampling variability of a statistic by its standard error. The standard error of the mean is an example...
16.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From Five-Number Summary to Absolute Heterogeneity: Recent Methodological Advances in Meta-Analysis With Continuous Outcomes.

Journal of evidence-based medicine·2026
Same author

Toward Evidence Synthesis of Adverse Events in Imbalanced Time-to-Event Data.

Journal of evidence-based medicine·2026
Same author

IL1R2 identified as a key hub gene regulating vascular endothelial function in Kawasaki disease.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Gut microbial bile salt hydrolase as a metabolic gatekeeper in digestive homeostasis and disease.

Frontiers in immunology·2026
Same author

gSV: a general structural variant detector using the third-generation sequencing data.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same author

Trial-design-aware funnel plot for publication bias assessment with non-inferiority or equivalence objectives.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Doubly robust augmented weighting estimators for the analysis of externally controlled single-arm trials and unanchored indirect treatment comparisons.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same journal

Prompt engineering of large language models for paper screening in medical meta-analyses and systematic reviews: A prospective comparative study - CORRIGENDUM.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same journal

Evaluating the accuracy and speed of eight deduplication tools: A comparative study.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same journal

A comparison of preprint search aggregators: comprehensive identification of preprints in the information retrieval stage of evidence syntheses.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same journal

Meta-research on key metrics of preregistered scoping reviews.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same journal

Facilitators and barriers to engaging patient partners in knowledge syntheses: A stage-based approach.

Research synthesis methods·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 17, 2025

Design and Optimization Strategies of a High-Performance Vented Box
14:23

Design and Optimization Strategies of a High-Performance Vented Box

Published on: June 9, 2023

1.4K

Optimally estimating the sample standard deviation from the five-number summary.

Jiandong Shi1, Dehui Luo1, Hong Weng2

  • 1Department of Mathematics, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong.

Research Synthesis Methods
|June 21, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers can now more accurately convert five-number summaries to mean and standard deviation (SD) for meta-analysis. New methods improve data transformation for skewed or normal data, aiding clinical study analysis.

Keywords:
SDfive-number summaryinterquartile rangerangesample meansample size

More Related Videos

Analysis and Specification of Starch Granule Size Distributions
08:46

Analysis and Specification of Starch Granule Size Distributions

Published on: March 4, 2021

5.5K
Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot
07:11

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot

Published on: January 7, 2019

35.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 17, 2025

Design and Optimization Strategies of a High-Performance Vented Box
14:23

Design and Optimization Strategies of a High-Performance Vented Box

Published on: June 9, 2023

1.4K
Analysis and Specification of Starch Granule Size Distributions
08:46

Analysis and Specification of Starch Granule Size Distributions

Published on: March 4, 2021

5.5K
Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot
07:11

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot

Published on: January 7, 2019

35.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Research Methodology
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Clinical studies sometimes report data using a five-number summary (median, quartiles, min/max) instead of mean and standard deviation (SD).
  • This is common for skewed data, but poses challenges for meta-analysis requiring mean and SD.
  • Existing methods for converting five-number summaries to mean and SD have limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an advanced, smoothly weighted estimator for sample standard deviation (SD) from five-number summaries.
  • To improve the accuracy of data transformation for meta-analysis, particularly for skewed data.
  • To provide practical tools for implementing the new estimation methods.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a smoothly weighted estimator for sample SD utilizing sample size information.
  • Derived an approximation formula for the optimal weight and a shortcut formula for sample SD.
  • Evaluated the performance of the new estimator through numerical simulations for both normal and non-normal data.

Main Results:

  • The proposed smoothly weighted estimator for sample SD demonstrated higher accuracy for normal data compared to existing methods.
  • The new estimator also performed favorably for non-normal data.
  • Combined with existing optimal mean estimators, these methods significantly enhance data transformation for meta-analysis.

Conclusions:

  • The new methods offer improved accuracy and utility for converting five-number summaries to mean and SD in meta-analysis.
  • These estimators can serve as reliable "rules of thumb" for researchers.
  • Practical implementation is supported by an Excel spreadsheet and an online calculator.