Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Farmer attitudes and motivation affect their health-seeking behavior in relation to mastitis in dairy cows-A survey on Swedish dairy farms with automatic milking systems.

Journal of dairy science·2025
Same author

Behavioural predictability in chickens in response to anxiogenic stimuli is influenced by maternal corticosterone levels during egg formation.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Suckling and allosuckling behavior of dairy calves in indoor dam-rearing systems.

Frontiers in veterinary science·2025
Same author

Towards assessing indirect genetic effects in dairy cattle.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE·2025
Same author

Healthy cows, happy farmers? Exploring the dynamics of mastitis and farmer well-being.

Journal of dairy science·2025
Same author

Untangling the role of environmental and host-related determinants for on-farm transmission of verotoxin-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157.

Infection ecology & epidemiology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 17, 2025

Comparison of Three Different Methods for Determining Cell Proliferation in Breast Cancer Cell Lines
12:35

Comparison of Three Different Methods for Determining Cell Proliferation in Breast Cancer Cell Lines

Published on: September 3, 2016

19.9K

Comparison of methods for predicting cow composite somatic cell counts.

Dorota Anglart1, Charlotte Hallén-Sandgren2, Ulf Emanuelson3

  • 1DeLaval International AB, PO Box 39, SE-147 21, Tumba, Sweden; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Clinical Sciences, PO Box 7054, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.

Journal of Dairy Science
|June 23, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Predicting cow composite somatic cell counts (CMSCC) using machine learning can improve udder health monitoring. Generalized additive models (GAM) and multilayer perceptron (MLP) show promise for predicting CMSCC with readily available milk data.

Keywords:
generalized additive modelmultilayer perceptronrandom forestudder health

More Related Videos

Determination of Mammalian Cell Counts, Cell Size and Cell Health Using the Moxi Z Mini Automated Cell Counter
13:16

Determination of Mammalian Cell Counts, Cell Size and Cell Health Using the Moxi Z Mini Automated Cell Counter

Published on: June 21, 2012

25.3K
Application of Long-term cultured Interferon-&#947; Enzyme-linked Immunospot Assay for Assessing Effector and Memory T Cell Responses in Cattle
15:57

Application of Long-term cultured Interferon-γ Enzyme-linked Immunospot Assay for Assessing Effector and Memory T Cell Responses in Cattle

Published on: July 11, 2015

12.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 17, 2025

Comparison of Three Different Methods for Determining Cell Proliferation in Breast Cancer Cell Lines
12:35

Comparison of Three Different Methods for Determining Cell Proliferation in Breast Cancer Cell Lines

Published on: September 3, 2016

19.9K
Determination of Mammalian Cell Counts, Cell Size and Cell Health Using the Moxi Z Mini Automated Cell Counter
13:16

Determination of Mammalian Cell Counts, Cell Size and Cell Health Using the Moxi Z Mini Automated Cell Counter

Published on: June 21, 2012

25.3K
Application of Long-term cultured Interferon-&#947; Enzyme-linked Immunospot Assay for Assessing Effector and Memory T Cell Responses in Cattle
15:57

Application of Long-term cultured Interferon-γ Enzyme-linked Immunospot Assay for Assessing Effector and Memory T Cell Responses in Cattle

Published on: July 11, 2015

12.6K

Area of Science:

  • Veterinary Medicine
  • Dairy Science
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Monthly cow composite somatic cell counts (CMSCC) are vital for monitoring udder health and milk quality in dairy herds.
  • Current sampling methods are time-consuming and automated tools are costly, creating a need for predictive alternatives.
  • Machine learning is increasingly used in mastitis detection, with CMSCC often serving as a predictor or gold standard.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a method for predicting cow composite somatic cell counts (CMSCC) between sampling intervals.
  • To utilize regularly recorded quarter milk data, such as milk flow and conductivity, for CMSCC prediction.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of different machine learning models in predicting CMSCC.

Main Methods:

  • Collected quarter-level milk data (flow, conductivity) from 372 Holstein-Friesian cows over 8 weeks.
  • Applied machine learning models: generalized additive model (GAM), random forest, and multilayer perceptron (MLP).
  • Evaluated models using 7-d and 3-d lagged data, with and without cow number as a predictor, via 5-fold cross-validation.

Main Results:

  • Generalized additive model (GAM) emerged as the superior prediction model.
  • Multilayer perceptron (MLP) performed comparably to GAM when using less data.
  • Including previous CMSCC data significantly reduced prediction error for both GAM and MLP models.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning models, particularly GAM and MLP, show significant potential for predicting CMSCC.
  • Regularly recorded quarter milk data can be effectively used to forecast CMSCC, aiding udder health management.
  • Previous CMSCC information is a crucial variable for improving prediction accuracy.