Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 17, 2025

Author Spotlight: Workflow for Integrating POCUS Data into EHR for Managing Heart Failure Patients
Published on: July 12, 2024
Perceptions of physicians and nurses concerning advanced care planning for patients with heart failure in Japan
Yuri Tokunaga-Nakawatase1, Ryota Ochiai2, Makiko Sanjo2
1Department of Adult Nursing, Nursing Course, School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan. tokunaga@yokohama-cu.ac.jp.
Background:
The importance of advance care planning (ACP) has been recognized in the palliative care of patients with heart failure. It is necessary for dissemination of ACP to characterize the perceptions of physicians and nurses towards ACP and to promote mutual understanding. The aim of this study is to investigate the perceptions of physicians and nurses concerning ACP for patients with heart failure.
Methods:
We conducted a self-administered questionnaire survey with physicians and nurses who belonged to the 427 certified institutions for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and/or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in Japan. The self-administered questionnaire was originally designed based on the guidelines on palliative care or ACP and previous studies on the barriers of ACP. We asked the participants the recognition about condition/timing to implement ACP, Content of care to be implemented in ACP, and barriers against implementing ACP. A Mann-Whitney U test was performed and r value was calculated an effect size (ES) in order to evaluate the characteristic perceptions among physicians and nurses.
Results:
Valid responses were obtained from 163 physicians (38.2%) and 208 nurses (48.7%). Regarding the condition/timing, nurses tended to recognize that ACP should be implemented from earlier clinical stages than physicians. Regarding the contents of ACP, both physicians and nurses placed emphasis in assessing the patient's perception of disease progression. The biggest difference was found in the item "Ask patient about what has been important in life so far"; 78.6% of physicians but 94.2% of nurses chose "it must/should be implemented" (Cohen's r=0.31). Regarding the barriers, both physicians and nurses recognized the difficulty in prognosis prediction. The biggest differences were found in the items "Medical staff does not know how to implement ACP for patients and their families" (45.6% of physicians and 70.4% of nurses chose "strongly agree/agree", r=0.27), and "There is disagreement regarding care goals among team members of different professions" (18.5% in physicians and 43.3% in nurses, r=0.27).
Conclusions:
It is suggested that discussions and further studies are necessary concerning the condition/ timing of implementing ACP from early stages, specific manuals/protocols and recommendation on rolesharing within a multidisciplinary team.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
07:49Author Spotlight: Investigating HR-Dependent Cardiac Function in Mouse Models Through a Novel Atrial-Pacing Approach
Published on: July 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Planning Nursing Care I
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Standards of Care II
Pericarditis IV: Nursing Management
Angina V: Nursing Management