Anlotinib or platinum-pemetrexed as second-line therapy in EGFR T790M-negative lung cancer

Run-Bo Zhong1, Jian-Lin Xu1, Yu-Qing Lou1

  • 1Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.

Abstract

Insights

Platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy demonstrated superior efficacy over anlotinib for T790M-negative non-small cell lung cancer patients post-first-line EGFR-TKIs treatment failure. This finding addresses a critical gap in second-line therapy selection for advanced NSCLC.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Medical Oncology
  • Pharmacological Research

Background:

  • Management of T790M-negative NSCLC after first-line EGFR-TKIs is challenging.
  • Anlotinib is approved for later-line treatment, but its second-line efficacy is unknown.
  • This study compares anlotinib with standard chemotherapy in this patient population.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of anlotinib versus platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy as a second-line treatment.
  • To compare progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR).
  • To inform clinical decision-making for T790M-negative NSCLC patients.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study of 20 patients on anlotinib and 42 on platinum-pemetrexed.
  • All patients were T790M-negative confirmed by cobas EGFR Mutation Test.
  • Primary endpoints: PFS, ORR, DCR.

Main Results:

  • Platinum-pemetrexed showed significantly longer PFS (median 4.5 vs. 3.0 months; P=0.021).
  • Higher ORR in the platinum-pemetrexed group (30.9% vs. 15%).
  • DCR was comparable (70% vs. 83%), and anlotinib's adverse events were manageable.

Conclusions:

  • Anlotinib is less effective than platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy in this setting.
  • Platinum-pemetrexed is a preferred second-line option for T790M-negative NSCLC patients post-EGFR-TKI failure.
  • Further research may explore anlotinib in different treatment sequences or combinations.