Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 17, 2025

Comparative Lesions Analysis Through a Targeted Sequencing Approach
Published on: November 5, 2019
Sex differences in solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: A population-based study
Jiali Wu1, Yize Mao1, Yiquan Jiang2
1Department of Pancreatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Objective:
Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas is a rare tumor. This study aims to examine the clinicopathological features and surgical treatments of SPN and compare the clinical behavior and prognosis between men and women with SPN.
Methods:
We collected the population data of patients with SPN diagnosed between 2004 and 2017 from the SEER database. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS), and log-rank tests were used to evaluate the differences between subgroups. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to screen out prognostic risk factors of SPN.
Results:
A total of 378 patients with SPN were included, with 246 (65.1%) female patients. 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 98.9%, 95.7%, and 93.7%, respectively. Survival analysis revealed that regardless of stage, patients with SPN who underwent surgical interventions still had a significantly better prognosis than those without surgical interventions (P < .001). The patients with lymphatic dissection had a significantly better prognosis than those without lymphatic dissection (P < .001). Moreover, compared with female patients, male patients had significantly poorer OS and DSS (P < .001). Female SPN showed a bimodal age-frequency distribution with early-onset incidence at 28 years and late-onset peak incidence at 62 years, while male SPN presented a unimodal distribution with peak incidence at approximately age 64 years. In female patients, the tumor size in premenopausal females (<65 years old) was significantly larger than that in postmenopausal females (≥65 years old) (P < .001). Clinicopathological characteristic profiles were different not only between male SPN and premenopausal female SPN but also between premenopausal and postmenopausal female SPN.
Conclusion:
SPN presents indolent behavior and predominantly occurs in young women. Regardless of stage, surgical intervention is recommended. Moreover, our study is the first large enough study to demonstrate sex-related discrepancies in SPN. Thus, different treatment strategies should be designed for patients of different sexes at different ages and hormone therapy is a promising approach for SPN.

