Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

620
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
620
Lateralization01:28

Lateralization

851
Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.
851
The Influence of Affect on Cognition01:29

The Influence of Affect on Cognition

209
Positive affect significantly influences cognitive processes, including evaluation, memory, creativity, and social judgments. Compared to negative affect, positive emotional states promote more favorable interpretations of stimuli, cognitive flexibility, and heuristic processing. These effects highlight emotions' powerful role in shaping how individuals perceive, remember, and interact with the world.Influence on Evaluation and AttributionWhen individuals experience positive affect, they are...
209
Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language01:10

Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language

3.0K
Language is a system of communication that allows the expression of thoughts, ideas, and feelings. The brain processes language in both hemispheres.
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...
3.0K
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

911
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
911
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.3K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Creating Something Different: Similarity, Contrast, and Representativeness in Categorization.

Computational brain & behavior·2026
Same author

Subcategory vs category fluency: Items and networks in healthy young adults and simulation with a large language model.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

Free recall of semantically related words reveals similarity structure.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

The Developmental Approach to Autism Science: Considering Cognitive Ability in the Age of Neuroimaging Research.

Developmental psychobiology·2025
Same author

Effects of scarcity on women's cognitive ability to manage mental health and substance use after prison release.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Performance in the Iowa Gambling Task in healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment.

Psychology and aging·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 17, 2025

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

15.4K

Evidence against a relation between bilingualism and creativity.

Kendra V Lange1, Elise W M Hopman1, Jeffrey C Zemla1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America.

Plos One
|June 25, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Bilingualism does not appear to enhance creativity compared to monolingualism. This study found no significant link between being bilingual or the structure of semantic networks and creative thinking abilities.

More Related Videos

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.3K
Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
05:33

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Published on: January 29, 2020

6.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 17, 2025

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

15.4K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.3K
Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
05:33

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Published on: January 29, 2020

6.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Linguistics

Background:

  • Prior research has yielded conflicting findings on whether bilingual individuals exhibit greater creativity than monolinguals.
  • Some studies suggest bilingualism enhances creativity due to specific knowledge representation structures, while others propose the opposite.
  • There is increasing doubt regarding the existence of a general bilingual advantage in non-linguistic cognitive tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if bilinguals tested in their second language demonstrate different creativity levels compared to monolinguals and bilinguals tested in their native language.
  • To examine the relationship between semantic network structure and creativity.

Main Methods:

  • Participants included bilinguals (tested in L1 and L2) and monolinguals.
  • A repeated semantic fluency test was administered to estimate individual semantic networks.
  • Bayesian statistical analyses were employed to evaluate hypotheses.

Main Results:

  • Evidence supported the null hypothesis, indicating no creativity advantage for bilingualism.
  • Analysis using best practices for semantic network estimation found no association between semantic network structure and creativity.
  • These findings contrast with previous research, suggesting potential issues with older methodologies or statistical artifacts in prior studies.

Conclusions:

  • The study challenges the notion that bilingualism confers a creativity advantage.
  • It also questions the role of semantic network structure as a predictor of individual differences in creativity.
  • Results suggest that previously reported links between bilingualism and creativity may be unreliable.