Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Antisocial Personality Disorder01:24

Antisocial Personality Disorder

457
Antisocial personality disorder is a chronic mental health condition characterized by persistent patterns of disregard for the rights and well-being of others. Individuals with antisocial personality disorder exhibit behaviors that include deceitfulness, impulsivity, irresponsibility, aggression, and a profound lack of empathy. These traits often manifest early in life and persist into adulthood, leading to significant personal, social, and legal consequences.
Behavioral Characteristics and...
457
Dark Triad and Person Perception01:29

Dark Triad and Person Perception

166
Person perception is influenced by both external behaviors and the observer’s internal characteristics, including personality traits. Individuals with dark personality traits, comprising psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism — collectively known as the dark triad – exhibit manipulative and exploitative tendencies in social contexts. These traits affect how they perceive others and how they are perceived.The Role of Dark Personality Traits in Person PerceptionBlack et...
166
Punishment01:27

Punishment

720
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
720
Primary and Secondary Reinforcers01:23

Primary and Secondary Reinforcers

738
In psychology, reinforcement is a key concept in behavior modification. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments involving rats in what is known as a Skinner box. The rats learned to press a lever to receive food, a primary reinforcer that fulfilled their innate need for nourishment.
Effective reinforcers for humans vary depending on the individual and the context. Primary reinforcers, such as food, water, sleep, shelter, and pleasure, have inherent value and satisfy basic biological...
738
Behaviorism01:28

Behaviorism

4.1K
The field of behaviorism was pioneered by figures such as Ivan Pavlov, John B. Watson, and B.F. Skinner fundamentally shifted the focus of psychology to the observable and controllable aspects of human and animal behavior. This shift marked a critical evolution in the discipline, emphasizing scientific rigor and experimental methodology.
The core premise of behaviorism is its focus on observable behavior rather than internal thoughts or feelings. This approach argues that true scientific...
4.1K
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

274
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
274

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Variants of Callous-Unemotional Traits in Middle Childhood: An Investigation of Emotional Regulation, Externalizing Behaviors, and Psychosocial Risk Factors.

Children (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

A brief report on making meaning of FoMO: post-Covid mental health and wellbeing in Minority Serving Institute.

Discover mental health·2025
Same author

Low Parental Empathy Predicts Callous-Unemotional Traits in Children With Enhanced Autonomic Sensitivity to the Environment.

Criminal behaviour and mental health : CBMH·2024
Same author

Primary and Secondary Variants of Callous-Unemotional Traits in Community Youths: Differences in Anticipatory Fear.

Children (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Moral decision making in adolescents: The effects of peer attachment, interpersonal affect, and gender.

Journal of adolescence·2022
Same author

Effects of COVID-19 on Physical Activity and Its Relationship With Mental Health in a US Community Sample: Cross-sectional, Convenience Sampling-based Online Survey.

JMIR formative research·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 17, 2025

An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children
05:04

An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children

Published on: October 4, 2018

7.3K

Reward processing and psychopathic traits in children.

Yu Gao1, Wei Zhang2

  • 1City University of New York.

Personality Disorders
|June 26, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Callous-unemotional traits in children show altered reward processing with social adversity, while daring-impulsive traits are linked to reward hyperresponsivity. Grandiose-manipulative traits were not associated with reward deficits.

More Related Videos

Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats
06:57

Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats

Published on: February 4, 2016

11.3K
Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

9.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 17, 2025

An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children
05:04

An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children

Published on: October 4, 2018

7.3K
Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats
06:57

Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats

Published on: February 4, 2016

11.3K
Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

9.8K

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Child Psychiatry

Background:

  • Psychopathy in youth is complex, with distinct dimensions like grandiose-manipulative, callous-unemotional, and daring-impulsive traits.
  • Understanding the neurobiological underpinnings of each psychopathic trait dimension is crucial but remains incomplete.
  • Reward processing deficits may be differentially linked to these dimensions, potentially moderated by social adversity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the differential associations between reward processing and the three dimensions of psychopathic traits in children.
  • To examine whether social adversity moderates the relationship between psychopathic traits and reward processing.
  • To explore the neurobiological correlates of youth psychopathy dimensions.

Main Methods:

  • Assessed pre-ejection period (PEP) during a reward task in 340 children (ages 8-10).
  • Caregivers rated children's psychopathic traits (grandiose-manipulative, callous-unemotional, daring-impulsive).
  • Analyzed PEP changes (as an index of reward responsivity) in relation to trait dimensions and social adversity levels.

Main Results:

  • Callous-unemotional traits showed reward hyporesponsivity with low social adversity and hyperresponsivity with high social adversity.
  • Daring-impulsive traits were associated with reward hyperresponsivity only under low social adversity.
  • Grandiose-manipulative traits did not show significant links to reward processing deficits.

Conclusions:

  • Findings suggest distinct neurobiological etiologies for different dimensions of youth psychopathy.
  • Social adversity plays a significant role in modulating the relationship between psychopathic traits and reward processing.
  • These results contribute to understanding the complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors in psychopathy development.