Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 17, 2025
Evaluation of Capillary and Other Vessel Contribution to Macular Perfusion Density Measured with Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
Published on: February 18, 2022
Repeatability of measuring the vessel density in patients with retinal vein occlusion: An optical coherence
Kyeung-Min Kim1, Min-Woo Lee1,2, Hyung-Bin Lim1
1Department of Ophthalmology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Purpose:
To determine the repeatability of superficial vessel density measurements using Spectral domain Ocular coherence tomography angiography(SD-OCTA) in patients diagnosed with retinal vein occlusion(RVO).
Design:
Prospective observational study.
Subjects:
Patients who visited our retinal clinic from August 2017 to August 2018, diagnosed with RVO were recruited for the study.
Methods:
Two consecutive 3×3 mm pattern scans were performed using the Cirrus HD-OCT 5000 along with AngioPlex software (Carl Zeiss Meditec) in each eye by single skilled examiner. All scans were analyzed using en face OCTA images to measure vessel density (VD) automatically. For further analysis of the effect of central macular thickness(CMT), eyes were divided into two groups according to CMT of 400μm (Group 1: CMT > 400μm, Group 2: CMT < 400μm). To identify factors affecting the repeatability of VD measurements, linear regression analyses were conducted for the coefficient of variation (CV) of VD by investigating demographics and ocular variables.
Main Outcome Measures:
The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV) of VD measurements.
Results:
A total of 57 eyes from 57 patients were examined: 35 eyes with BRVO and 22 eyes with CRVO. In all 57 eyes with RVO, the ICC and CV of the full VD(VD of 3mm diameter circle) were 0.800 and 10.61%, respectively. Univariate analyses showed that the mean CMT (B, 0.001; p<0.001) and mean ganglion cell-Inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) thickness (B, -0.002; p = 0.020) were significant factors that affected the repeatability. Multivariate analyses of these two factors showed that only mean CMT was a significant factor. The ICC and CV of the full VD in group 1 (CMT > 400μm) were 0.348 and 22.55% respectively. In group 2 (CMT < 400μm), the ICC and CV of the full VD were 0.910 and 7.76%, respectively.
Conclusions:
The repeatability of VD measurement in eyes with RVO was reasonably comparable to previous studies. Repeatability of VD measurement was significantly affected by central macular thickness.
