Platelet Transfusion in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Bobby Yanagawa1, Roberto Ribeiro1, Jessica Lee1

  • 1Division of Cardiac Surgery, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Insights

Platelet transfusions after cardiac surgery do not appear to increase complications like mortality or stroke when patient baseline differences are considered. Further research is needed due to the limited number of studies.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Transfusion Medicine
  • Surgical Outcomes

Background:

  • Blood transfusion is a known risk factor for mortality in cardiac surgery patients.
  • The specific impact of platelet transfusion on outcomes after cardiac surgery is less understood.
  • Observational studies are needed to clarify the association between platelet transfusion and perioperative complications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and meta-analyze observational studies to determine the impact of platelet transfusion on perioperative outcomes in cardiac surgery patients.
  • To compare outcomes between patients who received platelet transfusions and those who did not, after adjusting for baseline characteristics.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of nine observational studies.
  • Inclusion of data from 101,511 patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
  • Searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases up to January 2019.

Main Results:

  • Unadjusted analyses showed patients receiving platelets had more comorbidities and complex surgical profiles.
  • After matching or adjusting for baseline differences, no significant differences were found in operative mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, reoperation for bleeding, infection, or need for perioperative dialysis.
  • Pooled data from matched/adjusted studies indicated no increased risk associated with platelet transfusion.

Conclusions:

  • Platelet transfusion is not associated with increased perioperative complications in cardiac surgery patients when baseline differences are accounted for.
  • The findings suggest that confounding factors in unadjusted analyses may have previously suggested a link.
  • These results are considered hypothesis-generating due to the limited number of observational studies available.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos