Cluster-sets resistance training induce similar functional and strength improvements than the traditional method in...

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of 12 weeks of traditional resistance training (TRT) or resistance training using Cluster-set (CS) on functional performance and physical fitness of postmenopausal and elderly women.

Participants (61.1 ± 4.9 years, body mass 64.5 ± 1.8 kg, height 155.7 ± 4.7 cm) were randomized to TRT (n = 35) or CS (n = 31). Anthropometric measures, muscle strength and power, gait speed, core stability, flexibility, and functional performance tests were performed before and after 12 weeks of training. The difference between protocols was the structure of rest intervals. The TRT group performed 120 s of rest between sets of 8 repetitions, while the CS performed 30 s of rest after every 2 repetitions. Two-way ANOVA with repeated measures was applied for each variable and, when needed, the Bonferroni post hoc was used. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

No group by time interaction was found for any variable. Regarding between-moment comparisons, there were significant improvements for 1 repetition maximum (RM) bench press (F = 104.6; η_p² = 0.62; p < 0.001), 1RM leg press (F = 74.6; η_p² = 0.53; p < 0.001), medicine ball throw (F = 64.0; η_p² = 0.26; p < 0.001), standing long jump (F = 27.6; η_p² = 0.30; p < 0.001), countermovement jump (F = 17.4; η_p² = 0.21; p < 0.001), squat jump (F = 23.2; η_p² = 0.26; p < 0.001), plank time (F = 31.6; η_p² = 0.33; p < 0.001), 6 m walking test (F = 18.0; η_p² = 0.22; p < 0.001), sit-to-stand test (F = 20.4; η_p² = 0.24; p < 0.001), sit and reach test (F = 56.8; η_p² = 0.47; p < 0.001) and 2 kg elbow curls (F = 15.9; η_p² = 0.19; p < 0.001).

Considering that both CS and TRT methods were equally effective to improve the physical fitness and functionality of elderly women, the decision of which protocol to use should be based on individual preferences and practical aspects.