Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 17, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Does encouraging a belief in determinism increase cheating? Reconsidering the value of believing in free will
Thomas Nadelhoffer1, Jason Shepard2, Damien L Crone3
1Duke University, Kenan Institute for Ethics, Campus Box 90432, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Abstract:
A key source of support for the view that challenging people's beliefs about free will may undermine moral behavior is two classic studies by Vohs and Schooler (2008). These authors reported that exposure to certain prompts suggesting that free will is an illusion increased cheating behavior. In the present paper, we report several attempts to replicate this influential and widely cited work. Over a series of five studies (sample sizes of N = 162, N = 283, N = 268, N = 804, N = 982) (four preregistered) we tested the relationship between (1) anti-free-will prompts and free will beliefs and (2) free will beliefs and immoral behavior. Our primary task was to closely replicate the findings from Vohs and Schooler (2008) using the same or highly similar manipulations and measurements as the ones used in their original studies. Our efforts were largely unsuccessful. We suggest that manipulating free will beliefs in a robust way is more difficult than has been implied by prior work, and that the proposed link with immoral behavior may not be as consistent as previous work suggests.
Related Concept Videos
Personal Choice and Fate Attributions
The Behavioral Perspective on Personality
Fundamental Attribution Error
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Self-Regulation
Cause and Effect

