COMPARISON OF HEARING THRESHOLD ESTIMATION USING AUDITORY STEADY STATE RESPONSES AND BRAINSTEM AUDITORY EVOKED

Slobodanka Lemajić-Komazec1, Zoran Komazec1, Maja Buljčik Čupić1

  • 1University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ear, Nose and Throat Diseases, Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Vojvodina, Republic of Serbia.

Acta Clinica Croatica
|June 30, 2020
PubMed

Insights

Pediatric audiologists recommend hearing amplification for infants 6 months and older. This study compared click-evoked auditory brainstem response (c-ABR) and auditory steady-state response (ASSR) in children, finding strong correlations at higher frequencies, supporting ASSR as a valuable tool for early hearing assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Audiology
  • Neurophysiology
  • Hearing Science

Background:

  • Current pediatric audiology guidelines recommend hearing amplification for children aged 6 months and older.
  • Accurate hearing threshold estimation in early childhood is crucial for timely intervention.
  • Click-evoked auditory brainstem response (c-ABR) and auditory steady-state response (ASSR) are electrophysiological methods used for hearing assessment in children.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the results obtained by c-ABR and ASSR in a group of children with varying degrees of hearing impairment.
  • To evaluate the correlation between c-ABR and ASSR thresholds across different frequencies.
  • To determine the clinical utility of ASSR as a complementary method for early hearing threshold estimation in children.

Main Methods:

  • The study included 68 children with different degrees of hearing impairment.
  • Hearing thresholds were evaluated using both c-ABR and ASSR.
  • Correlation coefficients and individual differences between c-ABR and ASSR thresholds were analyzed at various frequencies (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 1-4, 2-4 kHz).

Main Results:

  • A strong correlation was observed between c-ABR and ASSR thresholds at 2, 4, 1-4, and 2-4 kHz.
  • Individual differences between thresholds varied, with smaller differences at higher frequencies (2 and 4 kHz).
  • The correlation between c-ABR and ASSR thresholds was particularly strong in children with hearing impairments worse than 40 dBHL at higher frequencies.

Conclusions:

  • ASSR demonstrates a strong correlation with c-ABR thresholds at key higher frequencies.
  • ASSR is a valuable clinical tool and an excellent complementary method for audiologic assessment.
  • Utilizing ASSR alongside other techniques can provide more accurate hearing threshold estimations in young children, facilitating early intervention.