Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 16, 2025

Adeno-Associated Virus-Mediated Delivery of CRISPR for Cardiac Gene Editing in Mice
Published on: August 2, 2018
Ocular delivery of CRISPR/Cas genome editing components for treatment of eye diseases
1Ocular Gene Therapy Core, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6 Center Drive, Room 306, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Abstract:
A variety of inherited or multifactorial ocular diseases call for novel treatment paradigms. The newly developed genome editing technology, CRISPR, has shown great promise in treating these diseases, but delivery of the CRISPR/Cas components to target ocular tissues and cells requires appropriate use of vectors and routes of administration to ensure safety, efficacy and specificity. Although adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors are thus far the most commonly used tool for ocular gene delivery, sustained expression of CRISPR/Cas components may cause immune reactions and an increased risk of off-target editing. In this review, we summarize the ocular administration routes and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of viral and non-viral vectors for delivery of CRISPR/Cas components to the eye. We review the existing studies of CRISPR/Cas genome editing for ocular diseases and discuss the major challenges of the technology in ocular applications. We also discuss the most recently developed CRISPR tools such as base editing and prime editing which may be used for future ocular applications.
Insights
CRISPR gene editing offers promising treatments for inherited eye diseases. This review explores ocular delivery methods, vectors, and challenges for CRISPR-Cas systems, including newer base and prime editing tools.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Genetics
- Biotechnology
Background:
- Inherited and multifactorial ocular diseases necessitate innovative therapeutic strategies.
- Genome editing technologies like CRISPR present significant potential for treating these conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review ocular administration routes for CRISPR/Cas components.
- To discuss the pros and cons of viral and non-viral vectors in ocular gene delivery.
- To summarize current research on CRISPR/Cas for ocular diseases and identify challenges.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of ocular administration routes for CRISPR/Cas.
- Analysis of viral (e.g., AAV) and non-viral vectors for ocular gene delivery.
- Examination of existing studies on CRISPR/Cas applications in ophthalmology.
Main Results:
- Adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors are common but may elicit immune responses and off-target effects.
- Various administration routes and vector types have advantages and disadvantages for ocular delivery.
- CRISPR/Cas delivery faces challenges including safety, efficacy, and specificity in ocular tissues.
Conclusions:
- Optimizing delivery vectors and routes is crucial for safe and effective CRISPR-based ocular therapies.
- Emerging CRISPR tools like base and prime editing may offer future therapeutic avenues for eye diseases.
- Further research is needed to overcome current challenges in applying genome editing to ocular disorders.
Related Concept Videos
CRISPR
CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing
CRISPR and crRNAs
The CRISPR-Cas system stores a copy of foreign DNA in the host genome and uses it to identify the foreign DNA upon reinfection. CRISPR-Cas has three different...
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment

