Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 16, 2025

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
Published on: January 9, 2016
Insurance access and demand response: Pricing and welfare implications
David Besanko1, David Dranove1, Craig Garthwaite2
1Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, United States.
Health insurance can increase treatment costs by enabling higher prices for liquidity-constrained patients. This economic model explains why pharmaceutical prices may exceed treatment value, especially with expanded insurance coverage.
Area of Science:
- Health economics
- Pharmaceutical pricing
- Insurance market dynamics
Background:
- Liquidity-constrained patients face barriers to accessing unaffordable medical treatments.
- Monopolistic pricing strategies in the healthcare sector are a significant concern.
- The relationship between health insurance coverage and pharmaceutical pricing requires further economic modeling.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an economic model analyzing the impact of health insurance on treatment accessibility and pricing.
- To investigate how health insurance influences a monopolist's pricing decisions for medical treatments.
- To provide an economic rationale for observed pharmaceutical pricing strategies.
Main Methods:
- A theoretical economic model was developed to simulate patient access to treatments under different insurance scenarios.
- The model analyzed profit-maximizing pricing strategies of a monopolist provider.
- The study examined the effects of cost-sharing mechanisms and expanded insurance coverage on prices and consumer surplus.
Main Results:
- Health insurance enables liquidity-constrained patients to access otherwise unaffordable treatments.
- A monopolist sets higher prices for insured treatments compared to non-insured ones, even with cost-sharing.
- Consumer surplus may decrease under such insurance and pricing structures.
- The model offers an economic explanation for pharmaceutical prices exceeding product-derived value.
- Increased insurance coverage for monopoly-provided services exacerbates pricing issues.
Conclusions:
- Health insurance, while improving access, can inadvertently lead to higher treatment costs due to monopolistic pricing.
- The findings challenge standard moral hazard models, highlighting a distinct mechanism driving prices.
- The study provides a theoretical basis for concerns about pharmaceutical firms setting prices above treatment value.
- Policy implications suggest careful consideration of insurance design and market structures for monopoly-provided services.
Related Concept Videos
Line Protection with Impedance Relays
Under normal conditions, low load currents keep the measured...
Distribution Reliability and Automation
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Reclosers and Fuses
A comprehensive protection scheme for radial distribution...
Load-frequency control
Maximum Power Flow and Line Loadability

