Intersectional Standpoint Methodology: Toward Theory-Driven Participatory Research on Human Trafficking

Area of Science:

• Social Sciences
• Criminology
• Sociology

Background:

• Human trafficking research lacks empirical and theoretical grounding, limiting its rigor and legitimacy.
• This deficit hinders bias reduction, the use of measurable variables, and the development of evidence-based interventions.
• Existing research struggles to address micro- and macrolevel interventions effectively.

Purpose of the Study:

• To propose an Intersectional Standpoint Methodology (ISM) for human trafficking scholarship.
• To address the limitations of current research by incorporating a more rigorous and legitimate framework.
• To enhance the creation of knowledge and evidence-based interventions for practitioners.

Main Methods:

• Qualitative methodology centered on standpoint theory.
• Emphasis on individual standpoints, structural obstacles, and lived experiences of oppressed individuals.
• Application of qualitative inquiry findings to macrosystems for societal change.

Main Results:

• The proposed ISM identifies measurable variables for exploring the human trafficking experience.
• It provides a framework for enhancing scholarly activities with survivors.
• It fosters community-based participatory research approaches.

Conclusions:

• Intersectional Standpoint Methodology (ISM) offers a robust framework for human trafficking research.
• ISM enhances scholarly rigor by centering lived experiences and structural analysis.
• This methodology supports the development of effective, survivor-informed interventions.