Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 16, 2025

A Saline/Bipolar Radiofrequency Energy Device As an Adjunct for Hemostasis in Solid Organ Injury/Trauma
Published on: July 28, 2020
Mechanical and surgical interventions for treating primary postpartum haemorrhage
Frances J Kellie1, Julius N Wandabwa2, Hatem A Mousa3
1Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Department of Women's and Children's Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Evidence on mechanical and surgical interventions for primary postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is limited. More high-quality randomized trials are needed to determine the effectiveness and safety of these PPH treatments.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Maternal Health
- Surgical Interventions
Background:
- Primary postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a major cause of maternal mortality worldwide.
- Mechanical and surgical interventions are used to manage PPH.
- This review focuses on the effectiveness and safety of these interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of mechanical and surgical interventions for primary PPH.
- To synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing these interventions with standard care or other methods.
Main Methods:
- Searched multiple databases including Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ICTRP.
- Included RCTs of mechanical/surgical methods for PPH management (e.g., uterine packing, balloon insertion, artery ligation/embolism, uterine compression).
- Two authors independently assessed study inclusion, risk of bias, and data extraction, using GRADE for evidence certainty.
Main Results:
- Nine small trials (944 women) were included, generally at unclear risk of bias.
- Due to heterogeneity, meta-analysis was not possible; most outcomes had very low to low certainty evidence.
- Specific interventions like external uterine compression, uterine artery embolisation, and various intrauterine tamponade methods showed unclear effects on outcomes such as blood transfusion, hysterectomy, and mortality.
Conclusions:
- Insufficient RCT evidence exists to determine the effectiveness and safety of mechanical/surgical PPH interventions.
- High-quality RCTs are urgently needed, with standardized core outcomes for consistency.
- Current evidence does not support the standalone introduction of certain interventions like condom-balloon tamponade in low-resource settings without quality improvement.
Related Concept Videos
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:

