Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 16, 2025
Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Statistical Evaluation of the First Year of a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Established in a Medical School Hospital
Hidehiko Narazaki1, Makoto Watanabe1, Makoto Migita1
1Department of Pediatrics, Nippon Medical School Hospital.
Insights
Japan
Area of Science:
- Perinatal Medicine
- Neonatal Care
- Public Health
Background:
- Declining birth rates and increasing low birth weight infants in Japan necessitate enhanced neonatal intensive care.
- A shortage of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) beds exists due to decreasing obstetric facilities.
- A new type of NICU was established to address this gap in care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the characteristics of a newly established NICU.
- To compare the new NICU's patient data with existing high-level NICUs and regular obstetric facilities.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective data extraction from medical records.
- Comparison of patient demographics including sex, gestational age, birth weight, Apgar scores, delivery method, and respiratory disorders.
- Inclusion of two high-level NICU facilities and two regular obstetric facilities for comparison.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in birth weight and gestational age distributions were observed across facilities.
- The new NICU admitted a higher proportion of low birth weight infants and those with respiratory disorders compared to regular obstetric facilities.
- Patient profiles differed significantly between the new NICU and other facility types.
Conclusions:
- The new NICU functions as an intermediate care facility.
- It bridges the gap between high-level NICUs and regular obstetric units.
- This model addresses the growing need for specialized neonatal care for vulnerable newborns.
Background:
There has been significant progress in reducing perinatal mortality in Japan. However, due to changes in social conditions, the total fertility rate and the number of births are decreasing, whereas the number of low birth weight infants is increasing along with the number of newborn babies that require intensive care. Further, although the number of high-level perinatal medical centers has increased, so has that of infants who need long-term hospitalization. Conversely, the number of regular obstetric facilities has decreased, thus resulting in insufficient beds for neonatal care. To fill this gap, we established a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at our hospital. This study aimed to evaluate our new type by comparing the data from ours with that from other facilities.
Methods:
The other facilities assessed were two high-level NICU facilities and two regular obstetric facilities. Data, including sex, gestational age, birth weight, Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min, delivery method, and presence of breathing disorders, were extracted from medical records.
Results:
The birth weight and gestational age distributions were significantly different in the institutions, except in one facility without a NICU. The new NICU saw more infants with low birth weight and respiratory disorders than the regular obstetric facilities.
Conclusion:
The comparison of birth weight and gestational age distributions, cases of respiratory disorders, and delivery methods indicate that our new NICU is positioned as an intermediate facility between a high-level NICU and a regular obstetrics facility.
More Related Videos
09:31Hemodynamic Precision in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit using Targeted Neonatal Echocardiography
Published on: January 27, 2023
10:38Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
