Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 16, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
Inter-regional metric disadvantages when comparing country happiness on a global scale. A Rasch-based consequential
Diego Fernando Rojas-Gualdron1
1Facultad de Medicina, Universidad CES, Medellín, Colombia. Universidad CES Universidad CES Medellín Colombia.
Abstract:
Measurement confounding due to socioeconomic differences between world regions may bias the estimations of countries' happiness and global inequality. Potential implications of this bias have not been researched. In this study, the consequential validity of the Happy Planet Index, 2012 as an indicator of global inequality is evaluated from the Rasch measurement perspective. Differential Item Functioning by world region and bias in the estimated magnitude of inequalities were analyzed. The recalculated measure showed a good fit to Rasch model assumptions. The original index underestimated relative inequalities between world regions by 20%. DIF had no effect on relative measures but affected absolute measures by overestimating world average happiness and underestimating its variance. These findings suggest measurement confounding by unmeasured characteristics. Metric disadvantages must be adjusted to make fair comparisons. Public policy decisions based on biased estimations could have relevant negative consequences on people's health and well-being by not focusing efforts on real vulnerable populations.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Correlations
Ratio Level of Measurement
A set of data measured using the ratio scale takes care of the ratio problem and provides complete information. Ratio scale data are like interval scale data, except they have a zero point and ratios can be calculated....
Ranks
Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test
Spearman's test calculates correlation by...

