Measuring treatment outcome in children with developmental coordination disorder; responsiveness of six outcome

Inge Heus1, Daphne Weezenberg1, Sebastiaan Severijnen1

  • 1Basalt Rehabilitation, Leiden/The Hague, The Netherlands.

Insights

The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and DCDdaily are more responsive for measuring rehabilitation outcomes in children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) than the widely used MABC-2. These instruments offer better sensitivity to clinical changes in DCD patients.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Developmental Psychology

Background:

  • Measuring rehabilitation outcomes in children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) is crucial but lacks consensus on appropriate instruments.
  • Instrument responsiveness, or sensitivity to clinical change, is a key attribute for effective outcome measurement in DCD rehabilitation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To prospectively investigate the responsiveness of six potentially suitable measurement instruments for DCD rehabilitation.
  • To compare the sensitivity to change of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2), Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), DCDdaily, Systematic Detection of Writing Problems (SOS-2-NL), Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF), and TNO-AZL Children's Quality of Life questionnaire (TACQOL).

Main Methods:

  • A prospective, observational study included 41 children with DCD undergoing multidisciplinary rehabilitation.
  • Six instruments (MABC-2, COPM, SOS-2-NL, DCDdaily, BRIEF, TACQOL) were administered before and after treatment.
  • Change scores, effect sizes, and standardized response means were calculated to assess instrument responsiveness.

Main Results:

  • The COPM (performance and satisfaction) and DCDdaily demonstrated significant responsiveness to change (p < 0.05) with moderate to large effect sizes.
  • The MABC-2 showed some responsiveness, particularly for the total score, but less so than COPM and DCDdaily.
  • SOS-2-NL, BRIEF, and TACQOL were not found to be responsive to clinical changes in this DCD cohort.

Conclusions:

  • While the MABC-2 is commonly used, the COPM and DCDdaily appear more sensitive to clinical changes in DCD rehabilitation outcomes.
  • The COPM and DCDdaily are valuable additions for comprehensively assessing rehabilitation progress in children with DCD.
  • Further research may refine consensus on optimal measurement batteries for DCD, incorporating these more responsive tools.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos