Do ICD diagnostics predict failure of ventricular tachycardia response to antitachycardia pacing and need for shock?
Mohammed S Al-Damluji1, Aditi Singhvi1, Meghan Snuckel2
1Cardiovascular Medicine, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut.
Insights
Heart failure diagnostics can predict when antitachycardia pacing (ATP) fails for ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). This helps identify VT events requiring shock, indicating decompensated heart failure.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (MMVT) in heart failure patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) that fails antitachycardia pacing (ATP) and requires shock is associated with higher mortality.
- The underlying reason for this increased mortality, specifically whether it relates to decompensated heart failure, remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if heart failure diagnostics from ICDs can predict ATP failure and the subsequent need for shock to terminate MMVT.
- To explore the association between specific heart failure indicators and the efficacy of ATP in terminating MMVT.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective review of 103 heart failure patients with Medtronic ICDs experiencing MMVT.
- Analysis of 452 MMVT events, examining pre-event heart failure diagnostics including atrial fibrillation burden, patient activity, night heart rate, heart rate variability, OptiVol fluid index, and MMVT heart rate.
Main Results:
- MMVT events requiring shock after ATP failure exhibited significantly faster heart rates and higher atrial fibrillation burden compared to those successfully terminated by ATP.
- Patient activity, night heart rate, heart rate variability, and OptiVol fluid index did not significantly differ between ATP-responsive and ATP-failing MMVT events.
- Multivariate analysis revealed that higher atrial fibrillation burden and lower patient activity were independently associated with ATP failure and the need for shock termination.
Conclusions:
- Device-based heart failure diagnostics are associated with MMVT events that fail ATP and necessitate shock.
- These findings suggest that indicators of decompensated heart failure can predict ATP failure in patients with ICDs, highlighting a potential mechanism for increased mortality.
Background:
Among heart failure patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (MMVT) failing antitachycardia pacing (ATP) and terminated by shock renders higher mortality as compared to MMVT terminated by ATP only. It is unknown if the higher mortality in ATP failure reflects decompensated heart failure.
Objective:
It was the purpose of the present study to determine if ICD heart failure diagnostics can predict the failure of ATP and the need to shock to terminate MMVT.
Methods:
This was a single-center retrospective review of 103 consecutive patients with Medtronic ICDs who had MMVT and received ICD therapy. Heart failure diagnostics preceding each MMVT event were reviewed including atrial fibrillation burden, patient activity, night heart rate, heart rate variability, Optivol® fluid index, and MMVT heart rate.
Results:
A total of 452 MMVT events were analyzed, of which 23% required shock. Compared to MMVT that responded to ATP, MMVT that failed ATP and required shock had significantly faster heart rates and higher atrial fibrillation burden. Patient activity, night heart rate, heart rate variability, and OptiVol® fluid index were similar between ATP responsive MMVT events and those that failed ATP. In a multivariate analysis adjusting for baseline characteristics, higher atrial fibrillation burden and lower patient activity were associated with ATP failure and shock termination.
Conclusion:
Device diagnostics associated with decompensated heart failure identified MMVT events that failed ATP and necessitated shock.
More Related Videos
06:10Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
16:40A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Related Concept Videos
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Dysrhythmias II: Classification of Tachyarrhythmias
