Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dr. Uhre et al. Reply.

Valdemar Funch Uhre1, Camilla Funch Uhre2, Nicole Nadine Lønfeldt3

  • 1Child and Adolescent Mental Health Centre, Capital Region, Denmark; University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Hvidovre Hospital, Denmark.

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
|July 4, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Child and adolescent psychiatry: challenges, solutions, opportunities, and future directions.

World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA)·2026
Same author

Parent- and child-reported executive functioning and response to psychotherapy in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: Results from the TECTO study.

European child & adolescent psychiatry·2026
Same author

Factors associated with employment and hospitalizations in early-onset psychosis: a clinical study with register-based follow-up.

Schizophrenia research·2026
Same author

Outcome and cost-effectiveness of transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy compared with management as usual for youth with common mental health problems: Long-term results from the Mind-My-Mind randomized trial.

Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines·2026
Same author

Early intervention versus treatment as usual for adolescents with first-episode psychosis: Protocol for the randomized OPUS YOUNG trial.

Contemporary clinical trials·2026
Same author

A preliminary examination of the inter-rater reliability of the Personal and Social Performance Scale in adolescents.

Scandinavian journal of child and adolescent psychiatry and psychology·2025
Same journal

Navigating Uncertainty: Facilitating Parent-Child Conversations about Immigration Enforcement-Related Family Separation.

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Trauma-Informed Principles on Informing Caregivers of Referrals to Child Protective Services.

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Editorial: Parental Support Increases Food Volume in Childhood Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder, But What About Food Variety?

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Editorial: Bringing Care Home: Intensive Community Services as a Viable Alternative to Adolescent Psychiatric Hospitalization.

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Educational Attainment Polygenic Scores and School Performance in Adolescents With Psychiatric Disorders: A Population-Based Analysis of 86,122 Individuals From the iPSYCH2015 Case-Cohort.

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Editorial: Beyond Risk: The Case for Protective Factors in Adolescent Suicide.

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry·2026
See all related articles
This summary is machine-generated.

This reply addresses concerns about our systematic review methodology for cognitive-behavioral therapy in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder. We defend our approach to analyzing CBT

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatry
  • Clinical Psychology

Background:

  • A systematic review on cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) faced methodological critique.
  • This response directly addresses concerns raised by Storch et al. regarding the review's conclusions.

Discussion:

  • The authors defend the methodological rigor of their systematic review.
  • Specific concerns regarding data synthesis and interpretation are addressed.

Key Insights:

  • The systematic review's conclusions on CBT for pediatric OCD are robust.
  • Methodological critiques are countered with evidence-based justifications.

Outlook:

  • Further discussion on appropriate methodologies for systematic reviews in child psychiatry is warranted.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Continued research into effective treatments for pediatric OCD is essential.