Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 16, 2025
In vitro Assessment of Aortic Regurgitation Using Four-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: February 25, 2022
In vitro experiments on ICOSA6 4D flow MRI measurement for the quantification of velocity and turbulence parameters
Hojin Ha1, Kyung Jin Park2, Petter Dyverfeldt3
1Department of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, South Korea.
Purpose:
To perform comprehensive in vitro experiments using six-directional icosahedral flow encoding (ICOSA6) 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) under various scan conditions to analyze the robustness of velocity and turbulence quantification.
Materials And Methods:
In vitro flow phantoms with steady flow rates of 10 and 20 L/min were scanned using both conventional 4D flow MRI and ICOSA6. Experiments focused on comparisons between ICOSA6 and conventional four point (4P) methods, and the effects of contrast agents, velocity encoding range (Venc), and scan direction on velocity and turbulence quantification.
Results:
The results demonstrated that 1) ICOSA6 improves the velocity-to-noise ratio (VNR) of velocity estimation by 33% (on average) and results in similar turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) estimation as the 4P method. 2) Measurements with a contrast agent resulted in more than a 2.5 fold increase in average VNR. However, the improvement of total TKE quantification was not obvious. 3) TKE estimation was less affected by Venc and the scan direction, whereas turbulence production (TP) estimation was largely affected by these measurement conditions. The effects of Venc and scan direction accounted for less than 11.63% of TKE estimation, but up to 33.89% of TP estimation.
Conclusion:
The ICOSA6 scheme is compatible with conventional 4D flow MRI for velocity and TKE measurement. Contrast agents are effective at increasing VNR, but not signal-to-noise ratio for TKE quantification. The effects of Venc and scan direction influence total TP more than total TKE.
