On precision dosing of oral small molecule drugs in oncology
Alex K Lyashchenko1, Serge Cremers2
1Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract:
Personalization of oral small molecule anticancer drug doses based on individual patient blood drug levels, also known as therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), has the potential to significantly improve the effectiveness of treatment by maximizing drug efficacy and minimize toxicity. However, this option has not yet been widely embraced by the oncology community. Some reasons for this include increased logistical complexity of dose individualization, the lack of clinical laboratories that measure small molecule drug concentrations in support of patient care, and the lack of reimbursement of costs. However, the main obstacle may be the lack of studies clearly demonstrating that monitoring of oral small molecule anticancer drug levels actually improves clinical outcomes. Without unequivocal evidence in support of TDM-guided dose individualization, especially demonstration of improved survival with TDM in randomized controlled trials, wide acceptance of this approach by oncologists and reimbursement by insurance companies is unlikely, and patients may continue to suffer as a result of receiving incorrect drug doses. This article reviews the current status of TDM of oral small molecule drugs in oncology and intends to provide strategic insights into the design of studies for evaluating the utility of TDM in this clinical context.
Insights
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for oral anticancer drugs can personalize treatment, maximizing efficacy and minimizing toxicity. However, more clinical studies are needed to demonstrate improved patient outcomes for wider adoption.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology
- Oncology
- Clinical Pharmacy
Background:
- Personalized dosing of oral small molecule anticancer drugs via therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) offers potential benefits.
- Current adoption by oncologists is limited due to logistical, laboratory, and reimbursement challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current status of TDM for oral small molecule anticancer drugs.
- To provide strategic insights for designing studies evaluating TDM's clinical utility.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of TDM in oncology.
- Analysis of barriers to TDM implementation.
- Discussion of study design for TDM utility evaluation.
Main Results:
- Lack of robust clinical outcome data, particularly from randomized controlled trials, is a major barrier to TDM adoption.
- Evidence demonstrating improved survival with TDM is crucial for oncologist and payer acceptance.
Conclusions:
- Unequivocal evidence of improved clinical outcomes, especially survival, is required for TDM to be widely accepted and reimbursed.
- Strategic study designs are needed to generate this evidence for TDM-guided oral anticancer drug therapy.
Related Concept Videos
Dosage Regimen: Individualization
Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods
Dosage Regimen: Fixed Dose
Fixed-dose regimens can be used for various routes of administration, including intravenous (IV) injections and oral medications. For IV administration, a predetermined amount of the drug is...
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Factors Affecting Dissolution: Particle Size and Effective Surface Area


